May 22 2013

Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF), Governor’s May Budget Revise, and Shaping Our Future are on the agenda.

The Budget Advisory Committee meeting will be held Thursday, May 23,  3:30 – 5:00 p.m. in the Piedmont Unified School District Office Board Room at 760 Magnolia Avenue.   The Budget Advisory Committee is under the direction of the Superintendent.  The members of the Committee have not been announced.  There will be no broadcast of the meeting, but the public may attend and participate in the meeting.

The Measure A School Support Tax Subcommittee members will be selected from the  Budget Advisory Committee members.  According to the tax measure, the Subcommittee is responsible for advising the School Board annually on the need for levying the Measure A parcel tax.

If an additional meeting is deemed necessary, it will be held on June 6 at the same time and location.

“The Program/ Budget Advisory Committee is a standing committee with representatives from all stakeholders in the District. Its purpose is to review the District’s Budget, share the information with constituent groups and generate recommendations for Board consideration in the Budget development process. Members will be asked to serve in rotation for a one to two year cycle. Responsibilities will include attendance at meetings and sharing of information with their representative group and to represent the interests of all programs and services for the District as a whole.

The Budget is fluid and therefore under constant “revision” as revenues and expenditures are clarified. The Program/Budget Advisory Committee is a vehicle to disseminate information to as many parents, students, staff and community members as possible. The Committee is advisory in nature and will not have decision-making responsibilities.”

For further information or comments contact: 

Superintendent Constance Hubbard, chubbard@piedmont.k12.ca.us

Sandy SpikerAdm. Asst. to Supt., sspiker@piedmont.k12.ca.us, 594-2614

 ~~~~~~~~~~

School Board Members:

Richard (Rick) Raushenbush, President, rraushenbush@piedmont.k12.ca.us

Andrea Swenson, Vice President, aswenson@piedmont.k12.ca.us

Sarah Pearson, spearson@piedmont.k12.ca.us

Ray Gadbois, rgadbois@piedmont.k12.ca.us

Roy Tolles (E. Leroy), rtolles@piedmont.k12.ca.us

Apr 24 2013

The Piedmont School Parcel Tax Advisory Committee will hold its final meeting on Friday, April 26, at 4 p.m.  in the Piedmont Unified School District Administration Office, 760 Magnolia Avenue, Piedmont.

 Since the current school parcel taxes Measures B and E are being replaced by the recently approved Measure A (approved by Piedmont voters in March 2013), the Advisory Committee, which was appointed by the School Board in 2009, has completed its charge, and its members will no longer serve.

Aside from the agenda below, no staff reports have been provided, and the meeting will not be videotaped or broadcast on KCOM.  Interested individuals must attend the meeting in person to hear the discussion. 

AGENDA

A. Call to Order Chair Ken Jensen

B. Establish Quorum (at least 4 members) Chair

C. Introduction / Welcome Chair / All

D. Approval of Minutes of Meeting of 12/11/2012 Chair/ All

E. Remarks by the Superintendent Constance Hubbard

F. Final Comments by Members of the CAC Chair/All

a. Chair Ken Jensen

b. Former Chair Jon Elliott

c. Other members of CAC

F. [G.] Discussion of 2013 CAC Report Content Chair / All

G. [H.] Adjournment Chair

• Draft Minutes for meeting of 12/11/2013 (to be handed out at meeting)

 

Mar 8 2013

The Borikas vs Alameda Unified School District (AUSD) case that played a major role in the flat tax design of Piedmont’s recently approved school parcel tax has been concluded in the Court of Appeal.

Upon rehearing, the three-judge First Appellate District court panel ruled that state law didn’t allow AUSD to tax a few commercial property owners 15 cents per square foot up to a $9,500 cap while all residential properties and most commercial properties were taxed $120 per parcel. The court had vacated its December 11, 2012 decision at the school district’s request, after granting a rehearing. The Appellate Court found that state law requires school districts’ special taxes to be applied uniformly and that the only exception the law permits is an exemption for seniors and low-income disabled people.  > Click to read more…

Mar 7 2013

A is for Appreciative – Thank You, Piedmont!

Measure A was approved by 77% of voters in the March 5th Special Election

Dear Piedmont Community,

With the passage of Measure A we would like to extend a heartfelt thank you for once again demonstrating your strong commitment to Keep Our Schools Strong.  You have just ensured 8 years of stable, locally controlled funding for our school district.

Seeing and talking with friends and neighbors on the campaign trail has been tremendously rewarding for everyone involved with the effort, and we feel honored to have received the community’s trust and support. > Click to read more…

Mar 7 2013

Dear Piedmont Community,

Over the last few months, an extraordinary effort has been made to engage our community in a public discourse concerning the funding of a quality education for our district.

Measure A was passed as a result of those conversations. > Click to read more…

Mar 6 2013

Piedmont’s Election Day was quiet at 6 polling sites as most casting a ballot did so by mail -

Children waved “Vote for Measure A” signs at major intersections to encourage Piedmonters to go to the six polling places that were open from 7am to 8pm on Tuesday, March 5.  Less than two hours after the polls closed the Alameda County Registrar of Voters reported the unofficial resulting vote.  The 52.79% of registered Piedmont voters participating cast 3414 “Yes” votes (76.50%) and only 1049 “No” (23.50%) votes.  In addition, there were nine “under votes”—meaning the voter did not precisely follow the directions for indicating their choice. The majority of votes were mailed in prior to Election Day with only 1,233 voting in person. > Click to read more…

Mar 6 2013

Opponents Support Progressive Tax and Senior Exemption to produce the same budget for the schools-

Piedmont’s Measure A election is unique in that both proponents and opponents want the same full funding for our schools. Opponents believe that the most expensive California school tax requires both a progressive structure and compassion for needy seniors. > Click to read more…

Mar 6 2013

Kids play online games designed to teach civics -

In 2009, retired Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor founded iCivics to help children become “knowledgeable, engaged 21st century citizens”.  O’Connor was concerned about research showing Americans’ declining civic knowledge and participation. Securing our democracy, she realized, requires teaching the next generation to understand and respect our system of governance. iCivics is committed to passing along our legacy of democracy to the next generation.  Playing the games, children learn about the structure, function, and powers of the legislative branch of government. They will explore the legislative process, as well as the influence of citizens and political parties. > Click to read more…

Mar 4 2013

“E Day”  Tuesday -

Tuesday, March 5, is ELECTION DAY in Piedmont.  Voting will be quick and easy, as there is only one measure on the ballot:  Measure A, the Piedmont School Support Tax, which will annually assess all Piedmont property owners $2,406 per parcel, plus a potential 2% per year escalator, for the next 8 years.

A two-thirds majority of Yes votes is required to pass the measure. If you haven’t already mailed your absentee ballot, you will need to deliver it to your polling location in person on Tuesday. Polls will open at 7 am and close at 8 pm.

After the polls close, election results will be available through the Alameda County Registrar of Voters website at http://www.acgov.org/rov/current.htm .

 

Mar 1 2013

Resident Asserts: The Piedmont School Budget could have survived a low income senior optional exemption -

How School Districts are funded in California is both arcane and extremely complex. Comparing districts is helpful and #1 academically ranked San Marino is probably the best comparable we have with its 13,161 population, similar affluence and limited but larger commercial tax base than Piedmont. Despite Proponent’s Feb. 7 LWV false comparisons necessitating an unusual School District correcting memorandum, Proponents continue to use this comparison in recent comments here at PCA.  > Click to read more…