Oct 16 2012

 Tax Helps Pay for Many Special Elements in Piedmont –

Since the passage of Proposition 13 in 1980, the residents of Piedmont have realized that for our community to have the things that we as a community value, we needed a City Services Tax.  Our city has had such a tax since 1980, and we have continuously renewed it for the past thirty-two years.  The tax is up for renewal this year and is on our ballot as MEASURE Y.  It will be at the end of your ballot and is not an increase over the past four years.  I urge you to vote YES ON MEASURE Y.  > Click to read more…

Oct 16 2012
Municipal Tax Review Committee Chair Gives His Reasons – 
 
The unanimous final report of last year’s Municipal Tax Review Committee (MTRC) advised the City Council that “the committee recognizes that passing the current parcel tax without addressing expense commitments is not fiscally prudent.”
Four of the nine members of MTRC went further to add preconditions to their support for a parcel tax renewal.  This past June, the new Budget Advisory Committee (with some of the same members as MTRC) issued its report, saying “The City’s pay and benefit structure is unsustainable.”As chair of MTRC and as a retired career budget director in the public sector, I expected the Council to use these findings and the past year to address the city’s critical challenges.  So at that time I did not join the four MTRC members who attached preconditions to the parcel tax vote.  But when the Council put Measure Y on the ballot without significantly addressing out-of-control expenditures, I had no choice but to join the opposition.
The MTRC report presented alarming discoveries and urgent recommendations.  Most important is the problem of exploding benefits, mainly pension and health.  Since the last real parcel tax debate in 2004, MTRC found that benefits, already among the richest in the state, were costing about 10% more each year, with little employee cost-sharing.  This is contrary to recently enacted state policy goals that can be used to bring down these expenses.As a former public employee myself, I greatly respect our city workers.  But a quarter of the city’s budget goes to support benefit costs, with the average employee receiving $160,000 per year in compensation.  Annual salary and benefits costs have increased by almost $6.4 million over the last ten years, which is more than the overall budget has increased, crowding out other essential needs such as sewer replacement. > Click to read more…
Oct 14 2012

Many Contribute Time, Effort, and Expertise  –

Many Piedmont residents are dedicated volunteers who contribute their time and talents to help make our community a better place to live.  Attention has recently focused on Michael Rancer, Chair of the 2011 Municipal Tax Review Committee (MTRC), who for the past two years, has applied his expertise and knowledge of budgets and public financing to help shine a bright light on Piedmont’s financial issues.

In 2011, Rancer was selected by the City Council to serve on the MTRC, and was then elected Chair of the Committee by his fellow Committee members. The 9-member Committee met for months in Spring 2011 and, under Rancer’s leadership, produced an extensive analysis of the City’s budget and financial projections.  The report was praised unanimously by the City Council.

In the March 2012 local election, Rancer publicly supported Measure A, the sewer service surcharge, and signed the “pro” argument  in the Voters Handbook.

Rancer’s education and professional background make him well qualified to assess Piedmont’s financial and budget issues. Consider his resume:

At  the Piedmont League of Women Voters Forum on Thursday, Oct.11, Rancer represented the “No on Measure Y” portion of the presentations. During his presentation, he  commented that he thought the personal attacks against opponents of Measure Y  should cease. Rancer had good reason for his comment, since he is the subject of a verbal attack by Councilman Jeff Weiler posted on Weiler’s  Facebook page.  Letter to City Council requesting an apology from Council Member Wieler; Letter to Council Member Wieler.

As Chair of the  MTRC, Rancer carefully considered various aspects of Piedmont financial matters.  Despite originally supporting the proposed Piedmont parcel tax renewal (Measure Y), he reversed his position when, in his opinion, City actions recommended by the MTRC were not taken.

Piedmont is fortunate to have generous citizens, such as Michael Rancer, who donate long hours to serve on City commissions, special committees, the School Board, City Council and numerous other public service positions.  PCA applauds all Piedmonters who contribute their time and talents to making our community a better place to live and  believe that, regardless of their personal viewpoints, these dedicated individuals deserve our recognition and respect.

 

Oct 14 2012

Cuts Would Affect City’s Quality of Life-

Dear Editor,

I am working with Piedmont friends and neighbors to inform voters why it is important to renew the existing parcel tax with no increase in order to maintain existing services.

Parcel tax revenues help pay for Piedmont’s police, fire, paramedics, park maintenance, street and sidewalk maintenance and other city services and amenities.  > Click to read more…

Oct 14 2012

Investments, Beneficiary Amounts, and Police Officer Industrial Disability-

The City of Piedmont Police and Fire Pension Board will meet Wednesday, October 17, 2012, 4:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers.   The Piedmont Police and Fire Pension Plan and the California Public Employee Retirement System (CalPERS) are both maintained for qualifying employees and retirees.  The two plans operate concurrently, yet independently. Employees hired prior to the City’s joining PERS continue to be covered by the Piedmont Police and Fire Pension Fund, while new employees are covered by PERS.

The return on investments and Piedmont Fund balance has drawn interest as a potential source of unallocated money when there are no remaining beneficiaries.

The agenda for the October 17 meeting includes:

  • Acceptance of Participant Report, summarizing benefits paid in the 1st Quarter of FY 12/13 and current number of beneficiaries
  • Report of pension fund investments by Osterweis Capital Management
  • Consideration of an Industrial Disability Retirement for a Police officer

Staff reports were not available at the time of PCA publishing. All meetings are open to the public.

Oct 14 2012

Annual Earthquake Drill returns to California 

On Thursday, October 18 at 10:18 am,  all school sites in the Piedmont Unified School District (PUSD) will take part in California’s annual earthquake disaster drill. Students will begin the drill in their third period classroom. Parents and guardians are requested to not visit the school during the drill unless directed to do so as a volunteer. The entire drill should take a few hours from start to finish. The drill is intended to prepare the staff and students for a disaster if and when one occurs.

The PUSD has adopted an extensive Emergency/Disaster Plan based on an international Incident Command System (www.ready.gov). All District and Site personnel have been trained in the implementation of this Plan through drills, workshops and periodic staff reviews.  For more information on PUSD emergency information go to the PUSD site.

Many organizations in California improve their earthquake preparedness in annual drills. The “ShakeOut” drills began in California and have now been organized in other states and countries.  In 2011, 8.6 million Californians participated.

ShakeOut.org has new recommendations for earthquake safety including specialized recommendations for providing for the safety of people with disabilities.

Oct 13 2012

The PCA website is currently experiencing a problem with receiving letters and information.  Until the problem is resolved, we ask that contributors send all submissions to editors@piedmontcivic.org.  Please include your name and Piedmont address. (Addresses are not published.)

PCA welcomes all points of view and information on civic matters.

Thank you for your interest and participation.

Piedmont Civic Association

Editorial Board

Oct 11 2012

Deadline Approaching to Register to Vote on Nov. 6-

If you are registered to vote, you should have received your sample ballot booklet.  If not, you may want to check your voter registration status online.  If you have moved recently or missed several elections, you may have to re-register.  You can renew your registration online, by mail (registration forms are widely available at most County buildings, post offices, libraries, Department of Motor Vehicle [DMV] offices), or in person at the Alameda County Registrar of Voters’ office in Oakland, 1225 Fallon Street, Rm. G-1, Oakland, CA 94612.  The Registrar of Voter’s office is open 8:30 AM – 5:00 PM Monday through Friday.

The voter registration deadline is always 15 days before an election. Voters who register after the 29th day before an election should receive notice of the location of their polling place in the mail, but they may not receive a sample ballot with information about candidates and measures due to the short turnaround time for mailing.

Oct 11 2012

October 25th meeting has been rescheduled to October 23 – 

The date and time for next week’s Piedmont Unified School District Budget Advisory Committee meeting scheduled for Thursday, Oct. 25 at 3:30 p.m. has been changed to Tuesday, Oct. 23 from 6:00 – 7:30 p.m. The meeting will be held in the District Administration office 760 Magnolia Avenue.   This change has been made to accommodate those who are unable to attend an afternoon meeting and to provide for a meeting before the next Board of Education meeting, which will be held on Wednesday, Oct. 24. This meeting will provide an opportunity for members of the community to give input on the proposal for the School Support Tax Election.

The following are other scheduled meetings of the School District Budget Advisory Committee:

Oct 11 2012

Resident urges voters and Council to demand projections –

Measure Y proponents on the City Council have been quick to make gloomy prophecies about what will happen if Measure Y is defeated. But none of the Council’s self-described “numbers guys” have ever backed-up these prophecies up with real fiscal projections.  > Click to read more…