Feb 7 2016

School capital improvement program to be considered by Board of Education.

At the Piedmont Unified School District Board meeting Wednesday, Feb. 10 at 7 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers, the Board will consider finalizing a School Facilities Master Plan. Funding sources and the total cost are not known at this time.

The Facilities Master Plan process combines the goals of PUSD’s Education Specifications and the information collected by the design team (including facility assessments) into a comprehensive plan for the schools of the Piedmont Unified School District. District staff and Quattrocchi Kwok Architects will present the PUSD Facilities Master Plan for review by the Board of Education.

The meeting will be broadcast live on Cable Channel 27 and on the City website.  The meeting is open for public participation.

MODERNIZATION

The Facilities Master Plan process combines the goals of PUSD’s Education Specifications and the information collected by the design team (including facility assessments) into a comprehensive plan for the schools of the Piedmont Unified School District. The main product of the facility needs assessment and Facilities Master Plan is a detailed proposal for renovations and/or additions to be made at each school campus.

The facilities master planning process takes into account all of the information on the District’s facilities, the needs and desires of faculty, staff and the community and projections about future District needs and creates a comprehensive plan for each campus that addresses these issues. The plan looks at issues holistically and creatively to find unique and inventive solutions that fit the specific needs of each campus and community.

The final Facilities Master Plan document provides a clear narrative and graphic summary of the proposed facilities improvements for each campus and also provides the detailed information necessary to successfully plan and implement the improvements.

View the proposed plan here.

Feb 6 2016

Is the Piedmont School District Following the Law?

For the third consecutive year, the Alameda County Auditor has unlawfully exempted dozens of otherwise taxable parcels from paying the Piedmont School Support Tax (Measure A), resulting in a loss to date of over $400,000 in District revenue.  Over the eight-year life of Measure A, the District’s loss will be more than one million dollars at a time of costly pension obligations and the apparent need for major facility improvements.

This needless loss should not have been allowed to happen.

Measure A (mistakenly called “School Measure B” on tax bills) required that as of July 1, 2013, each assessor’s parcel wholly or partially within the boundaries of the District pay the annual school tax, now at $2,503 per parcel. The one and only exception was for owners of parcels receiving Social Security Income (SSI). The District’s own attorney has said all other exemptions are “forbidden”. 

Measure A is a special assessment not based on the assessed value of the property. Hence, the Auditor and not the Assessor made the exemptions, most as a continuation of past practices but seven have been made since the passage of Measure A. One tiny sliver of unimproved land on my street has been routinely exempted for over 25 years. Many are small parcels ancillary to a larger parcel that have been exempted by owners in order to avoid paying the tax twice. A few are church parcels, exempt from the ad valorem portion but not the special assessment portion of their tax bills. And, ten are Oakland lots partially in Piedmont (including Mount View Cemetery) that have never been taxed.

Failure of the District to collect the tax from Oakland parcels may be a simple matter of negligence.  But allowing the Piedmont exemptions to continue and even grow over three years is inexplicable.

To date, no one has taken responsibility. The Auditor’s office said the current exemptions are based on a list provided by NBS, the tax-consulting firm retained by the District. NBS has said it has taken no action, formal or informal, to exempt any parcel. The District has said it has taken no action to selectively exempt property from its parcel tax, except for the two parcels that qualified for the SSI exemption. 

Whoever is responsible, there has been an appalling breakdown of communication between the District, NBS, and Alameda County. The Auditor correctly applied the uniform tax rate of Measure A to every Piedmont parcel except for those on the list provided by NBS. Over a period of three years, he has evidently not been told these exemptions are illegal.

The Measure A Resolution “authorized members of the Board, the Superintendent and officers of the District to do all things necessary or advisable to effectuate the purposes of the Resolution.” Although the District staff was apprised of the problem more than six months ago, it has yet to recommend the actions necessary to rescind the unlawful exemptions — and in the process enhance the school’s revenue.

Measure A is the law and every public official, appointed or elected, must obey the law, however onerous that may be.

William Blackwell, Piedmont Resident

Editors’ Note:  Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Feb 6 2016

The Piedmont City / School Liaison Committee will consider topical subjects impacting both the City and School District.  Consensus is frequently reached in an open exchange of information. Decisions are not finalized during the meeting, as they must be referred to the appropriate elected body for action.  Individuals interested in the subjects can participate at the meeting.

Tuesday, February 9, 2016

4:00 p.m.

City Hall Conference Room, 120 Vista Avenue, Piedmont, CA

The meeting is open to the public.  The meeting will not be broadcast or recorded for future viewing. Agenda:

  • 1. Update on the PUSD Facilities Master Planning Process
  •  2. Discussion of City Parcel Tax on the June 7 Presidential Primary Election Ballot
  •   3. Discussion of Pick-Up / Drop-Off Zone at High School and Middle School
  •   4. Discussion of Plans for Full Day Kindergarten and its Impact to Schoolmates and Opportunities for Cooperation 

Materials for the meeting have not been publicly disseminated, however they can be obtained at the meeting or prior to the meeting through the City or the Piedmont Unified School District.

Jan 15 2016

The Piedmont Education Foundation* is pleased to announce the appointment of Susan Terrill to the position of Executive Director. An extensive search this past fall by the Search Committee Task Force, made up of PEF Board members and community members, culminated in the recommendation of Susan for the position. “We spoke to many talented applicants, and found that Susan’s commitment, background and skill set make her a great fit for PEF and our community. We give her an enthusiastic ‘thumbs up’ and wholeheartedly welcome her aboard,” says Molly Ashford, Search Committee Task Force member.

Executive Director Susan Terrill

Susan Terrill

Susan brings leadership and valuable fundraising experience to her new role. Her background includes business development, non-profit fundraising, and marketing management in several industries, including arts, education, finance and healthcare. Most recently, she was the Director of Education and Visitor Experience at the Chabot Space and Science Center in Oakland. Before that, she held management positions in marketing and event production at Kaiser Permanente and Charles Schwab & Co., and development positions at the Commonwealth Club of California and the San Francisco Ballet. During her career, Susan has successfully managed diverse teams, developed innovative marketing programs, secured sponsorships for international conferences, and produced prestigious fundraising events.

Her interest in PEF and the Piedmont schools goes back even farther however – as a Piedmont native, both she and her brother were educated here. She is pleased her son, now in sixth grade at Piedmont Middle School, will have the opportunity to be likewise. “Having grown up in the PUSD system, I am intimately familiar with the quality of our schools – and the benefits that come from the amazing work of the Piedmont Education Foundation.  I am honored to build on PEF’s long tradition of supporting our outstanding schools and am thrilled to contribute to my community in such an impactful way,” says Susan.  “We are excited to welcome Susan to the PEF team and I’m confident she’ll help us achieve our fundraising and program goals,” says Christine Wente von Metzsch, PEF Board Chair.

The Piedmont community is invited to meet and welcome Susan at a reception on Thursday, January 28 from 5:00 to 7:00 pm at the home of Christine and Roland von Metzsch, 125 Wildwood Gardens.  RSVP to communications@piedmontedfoundation.org.  Learn more.

*The Piedmont Education Foundation is a community-based, registered 501(c)3 non-profit whose mission is to promote academic excellence, champion innovation, and provide sustained financial support to the Piedmont Unified School District. PEF raises more than $3 million annually for the K-12 Piedmont public schools, and is the steward for an Endowment valued at more than $6 million.  Responsible for providing nearly 8% of the District budget, we actively engage our community on behalf of the Piedmont schools.

Jan 10 2016

Community input is being solicited to assist in identifying needed school facility renovations and/or additions at each Piedmont school campus. 

Superintendent Randall Booker announced the following:

The Piedmont Unified School District is in the process of developing a Facilities Master Plan.  Over the past several months, we’ve held staff, student, and community workshops in preparation for the development of the Facilities Master Plan.  I want to thank those of you who have participated.  Your feedback has been invaluable.

On January 12th and 19th, we are hosting Community Outreach Meetings to solicit additional input. We encourage anyone from the community to attend.

These meetings will occur in the Piedmont High School Student Center on:

January 12th7:00pm – 8:30pm, and
January 19th7:00pm – 8:30pm

The final PUSD Facilities Master Plan is scheduled to be presented at the February 10, 2016 Board of Education Meeting.

To learn more about the Facilities Master Planning Process and review a variety of support documents, including a draft of the Facilities Master Plan, please click here to visit the PUSD Facilities Master Plan page on the PUSD Website.

The Facilities Master Plan process combines the goals of PUSD’s Education Specifications and the information collected by the design team (including facility assessments) into a comprehensive plan for the schools of the Piedmont Unified School District. The main product of the facility needs assessment and Facilities Master Plan is a detailed proposal for renovations and/or additions to be made at each school campus.

The facilities master planning process takes into account all of the information on the District’s facilities, the needs and desires of faculty, staff and the community and projections about future District needs and creates a comprehensive plan for each campus that addresses these issues. The plan looks at issues holistically and creatively to find unique and inventive solutions that fit the specific needs of each campus and community. The final Facilities Master Plan document provides a clear narrative and graphic summary of the proposed facilities improvements for each campus and also provides the detailed information necessary to successfully plan and implement the improvements.

Please contact Mr. Pete Palmer, Director of Facilities at PPalmer@piedmont.k12.ca.us if you have any questions.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Facility Site Assessment

“QKA Architects, Pete Palmer – PUSD Director of Facilities, and PUSD Maintenance staff performed a facility site assessment at each campus. The purpose of the assessment is to identify those improvements and remedial up-grades, along with their associated costs, required to provide safe, secure and well-maintained campuses, appropriate to the needs of current and future educational programs for the foreseeable future.”

Read more on the DRAFT FACILITY PLAN:  https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-vdk-LUzFEkNHhxc2tuZHU3bUU/view

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-vdk-LUzFEkeWJOejE0eHNlTVE/view

Jan 8 2016

Garrett Keating contends the City will have adequate revenue without the jump up in the Parcel Tax rate and funds are needed for school improvements.

In his last published column, Councilman Jeff Wieler challenged readers to propose changes to municipal services in lieu of supporting the proposed increase in the parcel tax.  To have that discussion, it would be nice if the Councilman stopped his harangue of others who don’t share his views.  The ink isn’t even dry on the proposal and Councilman Wieler already characterizes other views as “perverse” and negative.  

The basis of his column is the proposal from the Budget Advisory and Financial Planning Committee (BAFPC) that the annual parcel tax be raised by as much as 50%.  BAFPC analyzed the city’s facility maintenance needs and conservatively estimates that $0.5M is needed annually for deferred maintenance. Likewise, the city recently completed a review of its information technology and found that conservatively $0.5M is needed annually to upgrade its IT systems.  As an aside, these are “spreadsheet spending” analyses that need more work before they are used as the basis for a tax increase.  So a 50% increase in the annual $1.8M parcel tax brings in about the $1M needed to start facility maintenance and IT upgrades.    

The basis for the BAFPC recommendation is a projection showing that implementing this new spending will deplete the General Fund reserve by 2020. The BAFPC estimates that over this 5-year period, annual transfer tax revenues will be $2.8M, the average value for the transfer tax from the past 10 years.  Alternatively, using the 25-year trend in transfer tax increase, the tax has increased 10% annually to its present day value of $3.9M.  At that rate, the transfer tax will tax be $6.3M by 2020.  Even at 5%, the transfer tax will be $4.5M in 2020.  Transfer tax revenues for the past three years have been $3.2, $4.0 and $3.9M, respectively.

And there is no estimate in the BAFPC projection for the increase in revenue from property reassessment nor tax revenue from 8 new residences coming to Piedmont.  For example, there are 1000 properties in Piedmont assessed under $500,000 and if just 5% of those sold for $2M today (median 2015 Piedmont price), those sales alone would generate close to $1M in new revenue.  This property tax increase, coupled with the 25-year trend in the transfer tax growth, could likely exceed the revenue the BAFPC proposes to collect with the new tax.

As it happens, at its Monday meeting, the Council chose to go with only a 30% increase in the parcel tax, raising $500K annually with an increase of about $150 for the average Piedmont household.  The parcel tax increase will be on the June 2016 primary ballot and Piedmonters should review the BAFPC report and recommendations available on the city website:(http://www.ci.piedmont.ca.us/html/govern/staffreports/2015-12-07/parceltaxreport.pdf). 

As the debate heats up, consider these points. First, disregard any statements that not voting for the tax increase will lead to a reduction in public safety.  City reserve funds are at their maximum and the current parcel tax carries on until June 2017, leaving ample time to renew the tax should it fail in June.  References to cuts in public safety are simple fear-mongering.  Second, the spending estimates that justify the tax have not been fully researched and may be overstated.   As an example, estimates that the Sewer Tax needed to be increased by 50% were subsequently found to be inaccurate.  

Finally, Piedmont Unified School District (PUSD) is currently conducting a facilities assessment and will likely have a ballot initiative on the November 2016 ballot.   I hope the School Board brings forward a proposal to not only maintain school facilities but to modernize them.  Science and media laboratories, performance spaces and classrooms have all been identified as needing upgrades. 

Actually, maintaining the status quo with the city parcel tax and encouraging residents to support new school revenue might be the best strategy for the city.  Demand for Piedmont schools drives up housing prices leading to the historic increases in the city’s transfer tax receipts.

Councilman Wieler misses the point.  Opponents of the proposed tax increase don’t oppose better city services, they just don’t see why the tax need be increased when current and projected revenue will do the job.  Rather than argue about cuts, maybe we should be discussing revenues.

Garrett Keating, Former Piedmont City Councilmember

Editors’ Note: Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Dec 13 2015

Piedmont Unified School District Board of Education meeting of December 9 –

Report by High School Student Megan Wilensky –

On December 9, 2015, the Piedmont Unified School District Board of Education met for a regular meeting. The Board of Education meetings are held the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month, unless stated otherwise. At these meetings, the board members discuss goals, problems, and solutions for problems at Beach Elementary, Wildwood Elementary, Havens Elementary, Piedmont Middle, Millennium High, and Piedmont High schools.

At the beginning of the meeting, the participants were told the events that happened during the week and events coming up. Afterwards, students and other audience members had the opportunity to speak about problems at Piedmont High School, or other schools. Anna Morris suggested adding more P.E. options for students to receive P.E. credits such as yoga or pilates noting that other schools have more options other than regular P.E. in which students are more motivated to participate. She stated adding more P.E. classes will inspire students to be active and healthy in their own way.

Another topic was brought up by Chloe Lee Rowlands. She pointed out that at other schools, like Oakland Technical High School, seniors have days dedicated to writing college applications with teachers, counselors, and college counselors available to help out. She stated this would  reduce students’ stress levels and propel them through the college application process faster. I support this idea because I believe it would have helped me greatly when I was working on my own college applications.

A major issue discussed at the meeting on December 9 was the elementary Tri-school instructional design process. Teachers from Wildwood, Beach, and Havens spoke at the meeting about their process of improving the daily schedule at the Piedmont elementary schools. In the past they have found that they barely have enough time to get the kids into their work and finish it, and then transition them to a different subject. The time pressure they are faced with does not give the teachers enough time to successfully engage the children in their learning. At this point, they are not coming up with solutions, however the goal is to have three to four prototype schedules finished by January. These are sample schedules they will test out during the year that will try to solve the current problems by allowing more efficient transitions and empowering teachers to set realistic and reasonable expectations. The group of people working on this project, including teachers, parents, principals, and classified staff, have come up with design principles: the new schedule will support flexibility and creativity, create opportunities for integration of the curriculum, and attend to the well being of the students and staff. Changing the elementary schools’ daily schedules may also help connect the schools to the middle and high schools, and create a nicer flow from school to school.

At the meeting, time was also spent discussing the 2014-2015 and the 2015-2016 school year goals of Piedmont Middle, Millennium High, and Piedmont High schools. The principals at each school presented these goals to the School Board. Mr. Fletcher, the Middle School principal, noted that their goals are to maintain a positive school environment, support student learning with the common core, support, implement, and evaluate connected learning initiatives, and strengthen communication between teachers, parents, and students.

The Middle School has been looking at how much time it takes its students to complete their homework and how many times they need help while doing it. They have also started using an online program to enter grades like the high schools, and are thinking about the possibility of a new schedule for a later school day start.

Mr. Shaw, the Millennium High School principal, discussed their goals of refining the instructional strategies and tools, like technology use, and strengthening the structure and practice that promote individual goals.

Mr. Daniels, principal of Piedmont High School, said their goals are to promote student engagement and promote programs and technology. A few teachers have started using Google Classroom, an online tool for teachers to use to push out assignments to students and check the completeness. Also, the teachers at Piedmont High School have been learning about what meaningful homework is that actually helps the students learn and is not just busy work.

The School Board then approved of all the goals presented to them. I think all of these goals are good ones to have.

The goals involving technology are improving my learning experience already. When we received the chromebooks last year, I did not expect them to be as useful as they turned out to be since we now have more materials to use in class.

All the topics brought up at the Board of Education meeting by students, teachers, and principals were ones that I see improving the Piedmont school system for next year and the years following.

Editors’ Note: Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Nov 16 2015

On Tuesday, November 17, 2015, at 4:00 p.m., liaisons from the Board of Education and City Council will meet at the Piedmont Unified District Office Board Room, 760 Magnolia Avenue, Piedmont.  The public is welcome to attend and participate.  The meeting will not be recorded or broadcast.

The November 17 agenda includes discussion of:

A. Pick-Up and Drop-Off of students at Magnolia Avenue

B. Facilities Master Planning

1. School District Update

C. Trash at Piedmont Park

D. School Safety/Crisis Management

            Notice received 11/16/15
Nov 15 2015

Long considered changes provide shorter Thanksgiving Break, longer summer vacation, and first semester exams prior to Winter Break in 2016 -17 and 2017 – 18.  

At the October 14 PUSD School Board Meeting it was reported that a majority of the students, parents, and staff were in favor of final exams being before winter break.

On November 10th, the Board of Education approved the 2016-17 and 2017-18 Instructional Calendars for the Piedmont Unified School District,  2016-17 and 2017-18
The calendar highlights are as follows:

  • School begins during the 3rd week of August.
  • Places the end of the first semester prior to the Winter Break.
  • Incorporates a Flexible Professional Development Schedule.
  • School is IN session on Monday and Tuesday of Thanksgiving Week.
  • Schools are closed during the February President’s Week.
  • Last day of School is June 1st
  • Summer is extended (from the typical 9 weeks) to 10 weeks.

Background

Throughout the fall, as part of the calendar development process, the Association of Piedmont Teachers (APT) and District representatives developed a variety of Instructional Calendar options for consideration.  Although subject to negotiations, the District and APT gave consideration to input from CSEA, parents, and students.  Parents and students (grades 6-12) provided input on the 16-17 and 17-18 Instructional Calendars by participating in separate student and parent surveys.

Finals Prior to Winter Break

One of the District’s goals is to support the social and emotional needs of students by reducing unnecessary student stress.   One way to reduce unnecessary stress is to ensure that school vacations are in fact vacations
from school.  Surveys of District students and families showed strong support for ending the first semester before the Winter break.  In the most recent survey, completed on October 6, 2015, 78% of middle and high school students and 63% of District parents indicated that their “strongest preference for the timing of first semester finals” is before the break (448 students participated in this survey, along with 629 parents).

Calendar Requirements

The Instructional Calendar includes setting the first and last day of school for students, non-school days for students that are either vacation or designated
professional development days for staff. The setting of the semester length, report card grading periods, minimum days, conference days, and testing schedules are not subject to negotiations and are set after the Instructional
Calendar is voted and approved by the APT membership and the Board of Education.
The Instructional Calendar has strict requirements from the State that must be addressed:

  • 180 school attendance days – a day must be at least 325 minutes to count as a day. Funding from the State is calculated based on the attendance rate of students on the designated 180 student days in the calendar.
  • Each grade level must also offer a specified total minimum number of minutes in the 180 days.
  • Each grade level at each school must offer the equal amount of total minutes in the school/District (e.g., all third grades in each of the three elementary schools must offer the same total minutes per year).
  • Prescribed holidays included as part of the calendar with some flexibility when scheduled, except November 11, which is an “immovable holiday” and must be a non-school day if falls between Monday and Friday.
  • Per local agreement, the APT base work year of 185 days that includes 180 student days, 3 professional development days and 2 work days.

   Superintendent Randall Booker

Nov 15 2015

Piedmonters have noticed purple signage going up on lawns. The signs signify donors to the Piedmont Education Foundation supporting school activities.   See details below.

https://www.piedmontedfoundation.org/donate/anniversary-circle/

https://www.piedmontedfoundation.org/donate/donate-online/