OPINION: Vote NO on BB
Who are the Politicians in Piedmont?
BB seeks to prevent the “recycling” of politicians which leads to the question – who are these politicians in Piedmont? Measure BB defines politicians as termed-out councilmembers running for office again 4 years after stepping down. By that definition there are only two at the moment in Piedmont – myself and John Chiang, both termed-out from Council in 2014. Over the past 50 years in Piedmont, only one termed-out councilman has run again after 4 years and he lost. So BB is a red herring – termed-out councilmembers rarely if ever run again in Piedmont.
A look at candidates over the past 20 years in Piedmont (see table) shows that incumbency and campaign contributions are likely the biggest impediment to first-time candidates. Two trends are evident – candidates with established volunteer records win and first-time candidates with no or nominal volunteer experience have to raise from $12,000 – $20,000 to run and in some cases, that was not enough to win. First-time candidates face the greatest hurdles from sitting councilmembers, not termed-out councilmembers. Limiting that incumbency and campaign spending would be the best way to encourage first-time candidates but BB does neither.
Election |
Candidate |
Campaign Contributions |
Election |
Candidate |
Campaign Contributions |
Election |
Candidate |
Campaign Contributions |
2000 |
Matzger |
4589 |
2006 |
Allen |
2349 |
2012 |
Fujioka |
22,336 |
Labadie |
4838 |
Chiang |
10,333 |
McBain |
10,773 |
|||
Friedman |
9000 |
Rood |
18,553 |
|||||
Keating |
2959 |
Bostrom |
ND |
|||||
2002 |
Friedman |
12335 |
2008 |
Fujioka |
19,334 |
2014 |
King |
11,741 |
Wieler |
9461 |
Gilbert |
28,275 |
Rood |
4872 |
|||
Bruck |
1701 |
Barbieri |
13,957 |
Wieler |
950 |
|||
Rapson |
4134 |
2010 |
Wieler |
7065 |
2016 |
McBain |
8651 |
|
Chiang |
8415 |
Cavenaugh |
16,115 |
|||||
2004 |
Barbieri |
ND |
Keating |
3154 |
Levine |
6256 |
||
Watters |
8608 |
Bostrom |
ND |
If there are politicians in Piedmont, they are not returning to run again so BB is unnecessary. In fact, one could say that wanting to serve again is the sign of a volunteer – most politicians move on. Another sign of politicians is that they show their true colors once elected – why weaken voter choice by limiting who can run against such candidates?
BB is not needed and in fact will strengthen incumbency, making it harder for first-time candidates. BB does not “modernize” Piedmont’s charter – only one other city in California was found to have this 8-year rule.
Vote in favor of Piedmont volunteers and vote NO on BB.
Garrett Keating, Former Piedmont City Council Member