OPINION: Housing Decisions Should Have a City Vote
Utilizing factual information and critical thinking to discuss issues allows voters to make informed decisions. Voters need to be heard and provide input on an issue that will forever change the community.
The Housing Element, while necessary, must be done with community input, excellent planning and leadership. In the California Department of Housing and Community Development Department(HCD) “building block” of the Housing Element is “Public Participation.”
Below is an excerpt from the California Department of Housing and Community Department.
“Housing issues affect the entire community – residents, employers, and the
public and private sectors. The public participation requirement of housing
element law presents an opportunity to engage constituents in a dialogue
defining problems and creating solutions.” Housing Element Building Blocks
Had there been better and early communication and outreach to the community, we would not be in this predicament of many citizens confused about zoning, density bonuses, and the Housing Element. Dismissing the community’s opinion without a vote is not the democracy I would like to see in this community or anywhere.
There may be a cost for a special election, yet the contribution to ensuring inclusivity by each voter in this community cannot be undervalued. As HCD recommends the following:
“While the housing element must address specific statutory requirements, it is ultimately a local plan and should reflect the vision and priorities of the community.”
We might miss the “looming” deadline. Yet, we will have done the right thing to identify the correct sites with thoughtful, measured decisions that are in keeping with the long-term strategic planning of the city along with maintaining the charm and beauty.
Saving money and time should never be a reason to remove the right and privilege to vote.
Cori Recht, Piedmont Resident
