Jul 3 2016

Council Asked to Authorize Contract with Ray’s Electric

The Kingston-Linda-Rose Triangle is on the City Council July 5 agenda.  The Council will receive a report recommending authorization of a contract with Ray’s Electric for their “base bid of $207,362. ” Three ornamental street lamps will be a feature of the Triangle.

The Capital Improvement Project Review Committee stated in their June 2016 recommendation to the City Council the following:

Linda/Kingston Triangle: $175,000 (As proposed by the CIP Review Committee)

This project was conceived many years ago and began to gain traction with the increased neighborhood involvement in 2013. The execution of this project will benefit the local residents and the City of Piedmont in many ways. It will foster increased safety for pedestrians, help mitigate traffic speed, increase awareness of drivers, remove unnecessary paving, and create an improved gateway into Piedmont. It should be noted that this project is the focus of the Piedmont Beautification Foundation’s spring fundraising efforts, thus promoting another public/private partnership for improvements that benefit the residents of Piedmont.

The Linda-Kingston Neighborhood has pledged $4,610, Piedmont Garden Club has pledged $2,000, and the Piedmont Beautification Foundation (PBF) has pledged a total of $31,305 toward the current estimated construction budget for the Triangle of $283,594.

  • CIP Fund: $ 140,650 
  • Measure B Bike/Ped (Fund #131): $ 65,689
  • Gas Tax Fund (Fund #121): $ 39,340
  • Private Pledges: $ 37,915
  • Total Available Funding $ 283,594

The project provides a pedestrian triangle for pedestrians crossing from the City of Oakland side of the intersection to Piedmont along the southwest side in order to approximate the short pedestrian crossings across Rose and Kingston Avenues on the northeast side of Linda Avenue. It is hoped to also auto traffic.  The traffic study by traffic engineer consultant Kittelson & Associates, Inc. “made a stronger justification for the installation of “stops” at each intersection where there currently were none.” Following extensive Piedmont staff coordination with the City of Oakland, Stops were installed in October 2015.

The “current estimated construction budget ” in the staff report does not include the scope of services, leaving it unclear who will provide the masonry work, the landscaping and installation of the irrigation system.

The expense of the staff time devoted thus far and continuing is not included in the project budget presented.  For example, extensive staff negotiations with the City of Oakland and the new Parks and Projects Manager developed the Final Landscape Plan and  is coordinating “the design of the irrigation system with our consultant…”

Read the staff report here.

Read the Kittelson & Associates, Inc Kingston-Linda-Rose Triangle report here.

May 30 2016

Park Commission Agenda Wednesday, June 1, 2016, 5:30 p.m. City Council Chambers, 120 Vista Avenue, Piedmont. The meeting is open to the public and will be broadcast.

~~~~~~~~ AGENDA ~~~~~~~~

  1. Approval of Park Commission Meeting Minutes May 4, 2016*See below.
  2. Update on the CIP Committee Report to City Council May 21, 2016* See below.
  3. Update on Trident Maple Planting for Piedmont Park
  4. Update on the Hampton Park Master Plan
  5. Update on Linda Kingston Triangle
  6. Monthly Maintenance Report: Park, Open Space and Street Tree Update for the Month of May

Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the Park Commission are available for public inspection in the Public Works Department during normal business hours.

Update on the CIP Committee Report to City Council May 21, 2016

The CIP Committee is a committee appointed by the City Council and consists of four members from the general public, the chairs of the City’s Park and Recreation Commissions and the chair of Piedmont Beautification Foundation. At their first meeting, City Administrator Paul Benoit and Councilman Bob McBain discussed the current and future direction of the committee’s responsibilities and the committee’s outreach efforts to compile a list of new capital projects that would be considered by the Council as funding opportunities became available, whether through City funding sources or grants.

The Committee reconvened in February 2016 with Bobbe Stehr as the Chairperson and held (5) publicly noticed meetings with a tour of proposed CIP sites on May 7, 2016. The committee conducted extensive outreach process, inviting participation by individuals, citizen groups, commissioners and City staff. The process included an on-line proposal form on the City’s website. The Committee also developed a list of criteria used to evaluate all proposed projects and provide specific conclusions with recommendations for future planning.

The final report was presented to the City Council during their budget workshop on May 21, 2016.

The following is a brief summary of the project recommendations for the top five projects, listed in order of priority with estimated costs.

1. Coaches Field Master Plan $50,000:
• The goal of the master plan would be to assess the options for expanding the playfield area to include an under 14 -sized soccer field, study the options for artificial turf and the technical requirements for drainage, and research “dark sky” LED field lighting

2. Beach Tot Lot/ ADA Compliant Howard Ave. Entrance and Restroom Facilities: Master Plan $30,000.
• The goal of the master plan would be to review existing facilities, solicit community input and propose a new layout for improved recreational opportunities at the existing Tot Lot area, the unused area around the restroom facilities, and the space between the Oakland Ave. Bridge and Beach playfield.

3. Piedmont Community Hall: Entry Court Renovations $200,00-300,000
• New improvements would include enhancement to the entry court for ceremonial and civic events, improved event lighting, revised and expanded parking and ADA access.

4. Piedmont Community Hall: Rear Balcony and Amphitheater Architectural Master Plan $50,000
• The goal of the architectural master plan would be to study existing uses and recommend options for the building which would include expanding the terraces and rear balcony and renovating the amphitheater. Building and landscape renovations would improve the rental opportunities and expand options for community use.

5. Oakland Avenue Bridge- Complete the String of Lights $40,000.

  • A proposal was submitted by, Wm. Blackwell, to add two new light standards, matching existing light standards and infill the string of lights on both sides of the bridge.
  • The CIP committee also suggested that the safety issues on the bridge and pedestrian crossing be included in the future implementation of the Bike/Pedestrian Plan or as part of the Master Plan for the Beach Playfield project.

~~~~  DRAFT – ABBREVIATED PIEDMONT PARK COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES of Wednesday, May 4, 2016 ~~~~~~~~

Chairperson Totsubo called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m.  Present: Chairperson Jamie Totsubo; Vice Chairperson Jonathan Levine; Commissioners Betsy Goodman, Jim Horner, John Lenahan, Brian Mahany and Patty Siskind

Staff Present: Parks and Project Manager Nancy Kent, Public Works Supervisor Dave Frankel and Public Works Director Chester Nakahara

Also Present: Councilmember Robert McBain

Alex Chueh, Senior at Piedmont High School requested there be 1 or 2 lights around the dog park, specifically around the softball field.

Samuel Cheng, Senior at Piedmont High School, echoed the previous speaker’s request and also suggested lights leading up to Wildwood Avenue, as there are many people coming back from sports and they must walk in darkness.

Kalen Davison, Senior at Piedmont High School spoke regarding the tennis courts at Beach School, specifically the nets. He said the nets are well below the regulation height and considering they are used by many people, he asked that they be checked every few months.

Kaelli Thiel and Madison Tenney proposed installing a drinking fountain at the dog run at Dracena Park.

Parks and Project Manager Nancy Kent presented a request from residents near Lorita Ave Tree Planting Request on Lorita Avenue to add additional street trees and remove acacia trees on the street. Ms Kent also provided information on a 2012 petition from a resident at 32 Lorita Avenue asking the City to plant street trees along the end of Lorita Avenue.

The Park Commission heard this request and also heard from adjacent neighbors. Originally in the strip there were American Elm trees planted and residents at 208 Ramona received permission to remove them, but there was significant sucker growth afterwards. The City in managing that created a hedge of elm suckers. Those suckers were damaging properties on Ramona and the City removed the elms and replaced the planting area with low Agapanthus.

In 2012, after review by Commissioners, the end results were that several Commissioners were going to research drought-tolerant shrubs in lieu of planting street trees or possibly a Bay Friendly landscape installation and at that point there was no additional action taken except that the Agapanthus were installed.

Since that time, the fence which residents did not like at the end of Lorita had been replaced and the Agapanthus has been watered by one of the adjacent neighbors. Before the Commission today is a petition to have the City review existing street trees which are Ginkgoes and determine whether they can infill as well as remove the Agapanthus and put street trees in that strip.

Staff was on site talking with neighbors and held an informal meeting with the owner of 36 Monticello who volunteered to pay for 5 new street trees on the Lorita frontage of his property. Even though the petition did not include this address, since it takes up half of that side of Lorita Avenue, the Commission can consider whether it wants to accept the donation of 5 street trees and install them.

Regarding the existing number of trees, Ms. Kent stated on the east side of the street approximately every home could handle 2 trees which is the existing pattern.

Staff has also received additional correspondence, one from a resident at 28 Lorita Avenue with a pledge to water anything that is planted in the non- irrigated replacement strip. Also in the packet are two resident letters whose rear yard borders on the end of Lorita and they sent comments with concerns that if street trees were planted at the end of the street, it would add shade to their rear yard. They asked that plant materials be installed that would only rise to the height of the fence.

Staff suggested a substitution in the packet and said several residents are present to speak.

Public testimony was received from:.

Maggie Spencer, Devan Joseph, Andrew Coleman, and Patricia Makinen voiced their support for the petition. They stated their belief that the addition of new trees and removal of acacia trees to Lorita Avenue will beautify the street and give it more of a neighborhood feeling.

Ann Hall, 208 Ramona Avenue, voiced concern about the planting of new trees due to issues with backyard sunlight and root infiltration. She stated her familiarity with a dwarf crape myrtle which would be great and believes they would be watered, but she asked that no trees be planted which would affect the integrity of their property.

The Commission discussed the request, focusing on whether ginkgos are the appropriate tree for the area and how the trees would grow. After discussion, the consensus was reached that Ginkgo was the appropriate tree for the area due to the existing ginkgos on the block and the propensity of this type of tree to remain small when planted in a confined space.

Through this discussion, the Commission came to a consensus that the developer would be allowed to purchase street trees with Ginkgo trees and replace the Agapanthus with dwarf Crepe Myrtles which is what residents want.

Resolved, that the Park Commission approves the request by the petitioners to plant new Ginkgo trees along the street in locations and quantities to be determined by staff and residents; that staff work with residents to determine what existing trees need replacement and that staff work with residents of Lorita and Ramona to determine what planting is appropriate for the fence at the end of the cul-de-sac as long as it is not a tall tree; and that the Commission accept the offer of the developer at 36 Monticello to donate 5 Ginkgo trees.  Moved by Levine, Seconded by Siskind Ayes: Goodman, Horner, Lenahan, Levine, Totsubo, Mahany and Siskind Noes: None

Linda Kingston Triangle Parks and Project Manager Nancy Kent gave the following update:

Trident Maple Planting in Piedmont Park

Hampton Park Master

  • Working drawings which include irrigation are now being reviewed by the City Engineer who is putting together the bid package. The drawings will go out to bid in mid-May.
  • The City has been working with its maintenance staff, as this is the City’s kick-off project for their first SMART controller and they are looking at switching as many controllers out as possible. The new controllers have rain sensors, relate to the evapo-transportation rate and also allow maintenance staff to have remote accessibility.  Public Works Director Chester Nakahara stated they expect to have the bid out in May giving the contractors 4 weeks for the bid period and then awarding the bid. The bulk of the construction work should be done before school starts and while they are beholden to EBMUD and PG&E, the idea is to get the hardscape done, traffic patterns established and striping done in the area by the start of school and thereafter begin with planting and infill.
  • Parks and Project Manager Nancy Kent gave the following update:

• East Bay Garden Club has made a donation to the City to offset the cost of a new Trident Maple tree planted in the Main Park. This will commemorate their 30th anniversary. They have secured the maple tree which is at the Corporation yard. The ceremony date is May 24th and ceremonial planting will be at 10AM.

Public Works Director Chester Nakahara provided the following update:   Plan Update [Hampton Field]:

At its meeting of April 18th, the City Council awarded the project to Suarez and Munoz out of Hayward and the total bid price was $1,573,435.50. He noted an incredible amount of private donations have been received which now exceed $350,000. There have been continued pledges from various people to continue fundraising through the construction period and afterwards.

  • The contractor has been responsive, they are scheduling a pre-construction meeting in the next couple of weeks with the goal to start on June 13th which is the Monday after school lets out.
  • Work around the Piedmont Playschool will start first with the idea that when school comes back in session on August 16th they will have access and use of their yard area.
  • Further updates can be provided once the work begins.

Commissioner Goodman provided the following update:

  • Arbor Day was celebrated on April 26th at the Piedmont Community Hall with 150-175 people in attendance.
  • The Piedmont High School Jazz Band performed and guest speaker Bill McNamara, Director of Quarry Hill Botanical Gardens in Glen Ellen, showed slides and spoke of his travels to China where he would look for seeds of endangered plants which were planted in Quarry Hill and they created one of the largest collections of wild collected Asian plants in the world.
  • Emily Phillips was honored as the winner of the Arbor Day Logo Contest by creating a logo using the Piedmont Etc.
  • The closing event of the evening was acknowledgement of the newly planted Japanese Maple tree at the Japanese Tea House. The tree was donated by the Anderson family in memory of late Pete Anderson.  Chair Totsubo thanked Commissioner Lenahan for his public relations work and recruiting the jazz band to play at the event.
  • Commissioner Siskind recognized the AP Environmental Science class which had 6 exhibits.
  • Councilmember McBain thanked everybody for their hard work to put on the Arbor Day celebration.
  • Former Park Commission members commented on how much this event has grown from a fairly modest kids related event to becoming a great community event, who think this event is very rewarding and speaks well for Piedmont.The Commission thanked all the volunteers and City Staff who worked to create such a wonderful event.Park, Open Space and Street Tree Update for the Month of April: Public Works Supervisor Dave Frankel provided the following highlights, Arbor Day and Monthly Maintenance Report
    • Preparing the park for Arbor Day took most of the efforts of their department this past month.
    • Staff trimmed all hedges that surround the Tea House and Community Center, trimmed up and dead wooded all trees, prepared the new Arbor Day tree planting site by excavating down deep enough to plan the new 6,000 lb., 5 foot box tree. There was a massive block of roots they discovered at the 3 foot level and they worked for one day to remove the rest of the stump by hand, with 3 wheel barrels worth of roots.’
    • They were lucky to have the crane work donated by Professional Tree to the City of Piedmont. It saved them thousands in cost but he also recognized the owner, Brian Fenske who was at the controls. He is one of the most experienced, qualified operators and is extremely good at his craft.
  • After the tree was safely in place, they began landscaping around it. Staff installed about 1 1⁄2 tons of boulders, making sure they were placed in such a way that the overall feel of the Tea House was maintained.
  • Staff planted over 100 plants which he briefly described and they topped off the entire Tea House area with 20 yards of fresh mulch.
  • They were extremely happy with the outcome and his staff received numerous compliments.
  • He thanked the Anderson family for their generous donation as a memorial for long-time resident Pete Anderson.
  • They have begun the street tree reforestation project on Warfield. Last month all diseased and over-matured trees were removed. All of the concrete sidewalks were removed adjacent to those trees and stumps which allowed them more access to grind them out.
  • Sidewalk scallops were formed around the tree planting sites to allow a wider planting space and the concrete sidewalk was just finished being poured back today so all concrete work is done.
  • They expect to follow with planting the crape myrtle trees by the end of the week and will report back next month with a follow-up on this project.
  • They are continuing to solicit bids for some large tree removals in their park system. At Crocker Park, 2 large Canary Island Pine trees need to be removed.
  • Dracena Park has a large half dead Monterey Pine tree that sits up by the quarry and there is also a group of Acacia trees that need to be removed.
  • Grand Avenue median has a big dead Monterey Pine tree in it and staff will solicit bids to have this work done shortly.
  • They are also in the process of vetting out their new SMART irrigation controllers. They will allow the City to use water much more efficiently and have the ability to react to real time weather data; they have rain sensors and the ability to manage the entire system through the Internet, IPads, phones and computers.
  • They have taken one supplier out in the field to evaluate the technical signal challenges that Piedmont’s topography can create. Another field trip is scheduled this Friday and they will report back on this at the next meeting.
  • Those with newly planted street trees in parking strips, now is the time to use gator bags to water the trees.
  • Commissioner Horner asked if after tree removals, was it routine for maintenance staff to replant trees. Mr. Frankel said they typically replant street trees. For larger street trees like those in Crocker Park, they most likely would consider a different species and bring the matter to the Park Commission.Ms. Kent confirmed that most removed trees are the result of the drought and Mr. Frankel agreed and said most are Monterey Pine and Canary Island Pine trees.

Due to a lack of quorum, the July 6th meeting would be cancelled. There being no further business, Chairperson Totsubo adjourned the meeting at 6:51 p.m.

Comments for the Park Commissioners can be sent via: nkent@piedmont.ci.ca.us

May 26 2016

Report listing priorities presented by the Capital Improvement Projects Review (CIP) Committee to the City Council at their Budget Workshop on May 21, 2016  for potential funding. –

2016-2017 Capital Improvement Projects Committee  – Bobbe Stehr, Chairman

The Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) committee reconvened in February 2016 to begin work on project recommendations to the City Council regarding community needs and desires for new capital projects for the 2016-2017 budget cycle. At our first meeting, City Manager Paul Benoit and Councilman Bob McBain discussed the current and future direction of the committee’s responsibilities and the committee’s outreach efforts to compile a list of new capital projects that would be considered by the Council as funding opportunities became available, whether through City funding sources or grants.

After considerable discussion by the committee members, we recognized that under the new direction of the City Council, our responsibility was to conduct an extensive outreach process, inviting participation by individuals, citizen groups, commissions and City staff. The process included an on- line proposal form on the City’s website. The Committee also developed a list of criteria to be used for evaluating all proposed projects and provide specific conclusions with recommendations for future planning.

Under this new direction, the committee reviewed all new proposals; projects submitted through the on-line proposal form as well as long standing projects that have remained on the list. We considered all public comments and staff evaluations. All of our meetings were noticed to the public and our on-site tour of the proposed project locations occurred on May 7, 2016.

Our criteria for evaluating and recommending potential projects included such factors as wide benefit to the community, public safety, broad public support, and protecting and enhancing community assets. The committee also considered whether projects had funding options from public and private partnerships, revenue generating potential, expanded recreational opportunities and/or tied into the Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan.

We have listed every proposed project in priority order. There were four proposals that we concluded were actually not CIP projects, which we referred to the proper departments and have included those in the addendum.

We would like to express our gratitude for the initial guidance provided by City Administrator, Paul Benoit and Councilman Bob McBain; vital assistance from Parks & Projects Manager, Nancy Kent; very thoughtful and perceptive understanding of Piedmont’s extensive recreation needs by Recreation Director, Sara Lillivand and insights provided by our City Council liaison, Jeff Wieler.

Project recommendations listed in order of priority with estimated costs:

1. Coaches Field Master Plan $50,000

The goal of the master plan would be to assess the possibility of expanding the playfield area to maximize the use where a larger field would meet more demand; define the technical needs associated with artificial turf; research “dark sky” directional lighting to extend use time; and address the serious parking shortage.

Believing that it is more efficient to work with an existing facility and because this field is heavily used by several sports, expansion to a regulation under 14-sized soccer field would allow concurrent practice by more than one team at a time.

This field does provide some revenue-generation and does have public interest for cooperative private funding. It would also allow for more “home team” use and spirit.

2. Beach Tot Lot/ADA Compliant Howard Ave Entrance and Restroom Facilities Master Plan $30,000

The goal of the master plan would be to review existing facilities, solicit community input and propose a new layout for improved recreational opportunities at the existing Tot Lot area and the unused space around the restroom facilities, and the space between the Oakland Ave Bridge and the Beach Playfield.

The current Tot Lot is used heavily by residents and the City recognizes the need to maintain tot lot facilities for the neighborhood. In its current location and configuration, the tot lot is unsafe with an unguarded retaining wall and outdated play equipment. An overall study of the most efficient use of the space now occupied by the Tot Lot and its situation with the tennis court, playfield and restrooms, plus access to and from each component would improve the flow and maximize the future use of the area.

The Recreation Director has requested that the Tot Lot not be looked at in isolation, but incorporated into an overall, long-range vision for the area, which may include relocation to the other side of the playfield. This would put the play area closer to the existing restrooms and eliminate the sand creep onto the tennis courts.

Additionally, with the completion of the new townhouses at 408 Linda Ave, it would be a great opportunity for the City to improve the use, aesthetics and functionality of the area between the Oakland Ave Bridge and Linda Beach Field.

In the current budget, Public Works is in the planning stage for the ADA access from Howard Ave and the City is currently reviewing all play structures in the City for safety compliance as well as a schedule for play equipment replacement. This is the time for a Master Plan for this area.

3. Piedmont Community Hall – Entry Court Renovation, $200,000 – $300,000

Parking and ADA access are the urgent needs for this facility and a top priority for the Recreation Department. The recommendation is to enhance the entry court for ceremonial and civic events with decorative paving and improved event lighting. The plan would redirect service vehicles to the edge of the turnaround and relocate the trash area, eliminating the need for heavy trucks to cross the entry court. 2

Currently the City Engineer is working on a survey of the parking possibilities and ADA access. If feasible, the committee recommends that the entry court be upgraded sooner rather than later.

4. Piedmont Community Hall – Rear Balcony and Amphitheater Architectural Master Plan $50,000

Because the Community Hall is in full use nearly daily, an architectural master plan would study and propose enhancements that would improve use, circulation and revenue generation.

Expanding the terraces and rear balcony of Community Hall over enlarged space beneath, would greatly improve the rental opportunities and community programs use with the inclusion of indoor/outdoor access.

Relocating the pre-school facilities to a more easily accessible location would free the lower level of the Hall and provide space for concurrent facility use, better storage and increased rental revenues.

The Amphitheater currently is over impacted and underutilized. An upgrade to permeable paving with current water catchment technology would be both environmentally smart and revitalize the overall area. Relocating the bleachers and access from both stories of the Hall to the amphitheater would connect this space to the interior spaces for better flow and function.

Community Hall is a perfect venue for public/private funding.

5. Oakland Avenue Bridge – Complete the String of Lights $40,000

This is a new proposal by William Blackwell who has done extensive research on both the engineering requirements to add two new light standards, suppliers for exact matches to the existing light standards and the infill string of lights. This definitely qualifies as a stand-alone project to revive what was once a stately entrance to the City of Piedmont.

This is a project that would attract private funding from several sources.

Both Mr. Blackwell and the CIP committee independently came to the same conclusion while on site at the bridge. The Oakland Avenue Bridge is in dire need of some safety improvements. Crossing Oakland Avenue at the crosswalks at both ends of the bridge on the way to or from the Beach playfield area is hazardous.

The CIP committee suggests that the safety issues be included in the future implementation of the Bike/Pedestrian Plan or as part of the Master Plan for the Beach Playfield project.

6. Highland Strip $200,000

Because of the recent wet winter, momentum has stalled for a drought tolerant and native garden to replace the lawn at the intersection of Sheridan Avenue and Highland Avenue. There were regional interests to fund parts of this project, however, much more education and outreach appears to be needed.

7. Dracena Park: Upper Park Master Plan, Ravine Lighting and Pathway improvements $30,000 – $75,000

Proposed by Garrett Keating, Daniel Stein and John Lambert, the three elements were considered individually.

A Master Plan for Upper Dracena Park, especially one that can be implemented incrementally, could be valuable, however, the CIP Committee would need further direction from the Park Commission and we suggested that the proposal be presented to the Park Commission.

Pathway lighting within City parks has been discussed over the years and current policy is not to have artificial lighting from dusk to dawn at most locations.

The request to repair the sidewalk along Dracena Avenue, add handrails and clearly marked crosswalk painting at the intersection of Park Way and Dracena Avenue have been referred to Public Works Maintenance Department.

8. Blair Park: Split Rail Fence, Additional Trees, Parking Lot $65,000 – $100,000

Two separate proposals were reviewed together: Marge Blackwell proposed a split-rail fence along Moraga Avenue for the length of the park and additional planting within the park; Melanie Robertson proposed new trees along Moraga Avenue and a small parking lot for park users.

A split rail fence could be a charming addition and more trees in a park would be wonderful. However, the site does not currently have any water supply that would be needed to irrigate new landscaping and the estimated cost of a new water meter is $65,000. In addition, the City is in the process of having the park’s boundaries surveyed and the CIP committee concluded that any project in Blair Park should be put on hold for the present and would likely need to be considered by the Park Commission at some future date.

ADDENDUM TO CIP RECOMMENDATIONS FOR 2016-2017:

Two proposals submitted by Paul Lettieri and Tom Gandesberg requested repaving for safety and bike access. These were referred to the Public Works Maintenance Department and are currently being implemented.

Tom Gandesberg also suggested better irrigation for the median in the 300 block of San Carlos Avenue. Again, this location is currently being upgraded to a more water efficient irrigation system as part of the City’s cyclical review of medians,

Bob Kunselman proposed a new License Plate Reader on Trestle Glen Road. Parks and Projects Manager, Nancy Kent contacted Police Chief Rikki Goede for guidance on this. Chief Goede contacted Mr. Gandesberg and provided the CIP committee with her determination.

I wrote a thank you letter to each person who proposed a project, stating the CIP committee’s appreciation for their suggestions and informing them of the status of each proposal.

Bobbe Stehr, Chair of CIP Committee

_______________________

Recordings  and minutes of the CIP meetings are not available, as no recordings or minutes were produced.

Residents interested in providing input to the Council on Budget priorities may send emails to John Tulloch, City Clerk:

jtulloch@piedmont.ci.ca.us

Next Council consideration of the 2016-17 Budget is June 6, 2016, at 7:30 p.m. City Hall.  The Council meeting will be recorded and broadcast.

____________

Members of the CIP Committee are:

Michael Henn

Susan Herrick

Bobbe Stehr, Chair

Jamie Totsubo

PBF (Piedmont Beautification Foundation)      Representative – Deborah Van Nest

Representative of Recreation Commission

Representative of Park Commission 

Council Liaison: Jeff Wieler (H) 428-1648
Staff Liaisons: Chester Nakahara (W) 420-3061 & Nancy Kent (W) 420-3064

May 20 2016

Historic Piedmont Then and Now Walk Focuses on Early 1900’s

The next in a series of popular Piedmont Then and Now walks will take place on Thursday, June 2, and repeated on Saturday, June 4. The walk covering roughly 2 miles begins at 10 a.m. and ends at noon.

Historic Piedmont Then and Now walks are sponsored by the Piedmont League of Women Voters and the Piedmont Historical Society.

This walk will step back in time to the early 1900’s, a time of major growth for the emerging city of Piedmont. It will focus on the achievements of Frank Havens, the real estate maven responsible for developing much of early Piedmont. Havens is credited with creating Piedmont Park, a Victorian pleasure park complete with a clubhouse, gardens and art gallery, as well as building his own grand estate in Wildwood Gardens.

The walk will focus on local residents’ far‐sighted decision to incorporate Piedmont as a city and pursue ambitious construction projects including the combined city hall and fire station, two grade schools, the Oakland Avenue Bridge, a Sunday school and a commercial center – all in just six short years.

The walks are free and open to all but are limited to 30 people. To sign up, email marjb@sbcglobal.net by Friday, May 27. Details of where to meet and the walk route will be provided to those who sign up.

May 18 2016

Attend the Saturday, May 21, Council Budget Work Session and learn how your taxes are spent.

The public is invited to attend the Work Shop and speak to the City Council about spending priorities for the city in the coming year. 

Saturday, May 21st – 9:00 a.m.

The Budget Work Shop will be held in the Emergency Operations Center in the Police Department at 408 Highland.

The Piedmont City Council will consider the proposed annual budget for fiscal year 2016-2017 at three separate meetings.

Those attending will hear briefings from departments heads – Police Chief, Fire Chief, Recreation Director, etc. These presentations will be preceded by City Administrator Paul Benoit introduction. Council members will have an opportunity to make inquiries about the budget in the relaxed setting.

Public participants may also make inquiries at the Work Session and can observe the inner workings of the budget process.  

There will be no broadcasts of the Work Session.  

Spending priorities, revenue projections, and planned expenditures are rarely changed after the Budget Work Session.

Click to visit the 2016-2017 Proposed Budget page, where all sections of the budget are available for download.

Two required Public Hearings regarding the proposed budget and the levy of the Municipal Services Tax and the Sewer Tax will be held during the regularly scheduled City Council meetings on:

June 6 and June 20, 2016.  

For questions on contents of the budget, please contact Interim Finance Director Jim O’Leary via email at joleary@ci.piedmont.ca.us or by phone at 420-3045 with any questions.

If you wish to write to the City Council regarding the Budget, please address your letter to City Council, 120 Vista Avenue, Piedmont, 94611 or send an email to the City Clerk at cityclerk@ci.piedmont.ca.us , who will forward your comments to the Council.

2016-2017 Proposed Budget   <

May 15 2016

The Recreation Commission will consider Summer activities update, Hampton Park Master Plan, Recreation Department/Veteran’s Hall Master Plan, and Aquatics Master Plan at the Wednesday, May 18, 2016, Recreation Commission meeting starting at 7:30 p.m.  in the City Council Chambers, 120 Vista Avenue, Piedmont.

The meeting is open for public participation.  The meeting can be observed live on Cable Channel 27 and from the City website under on-line videos.

Read the > Recreation Commission Agenda for May 18 and the > Draft April 20 minutes

Comments or questions on Summer activities, the Hampton Park Master Plan, Recreation Department/Veteran’s Hall Master Plan, and Aquatics Master Plan or other Recreation Commission issues may be sent to the Commission via the Recreation Director Sara Lillevand at slillevand@ci.piedmont.ca.us.

May 13 2016

On May 4, 2016, I attended the Piedmont Park Commission meeting held in the City Council Chambers within City Hall. As soon as the conversation among the Commissioners tapered off, Chairperson Jamie Totsubo called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. Everyone stood solemnly. Briefly remembering elementary school blackboards and the faded 1970s American flag half furled on a stick, I joined in the Pledge of Allegiance.

Beginning the meeting were seniors from Piedmont High School, speaking during the Public Forum. The Commissioners were particularly attentive, half bemused at civic duty incentivized with gradebook points, but all genuinely wished to hear proposals.

In a terse forty­ five second speech, Alex Chueh and I proposed to add lights around the softball field near the dog park ramp by Wildwood Elementary School. Alex introduced the two of us and briefly outlined the possible locations for a new electric light, similar to the new white lamps replacing flickering orange sodium flames. Explaining the need for lights, I mentioned that students often return in the dark after sports practices as they walked near the park’s exit, especially when Daylight Savings Time ends. Some Commissioners nodded at the mention of students and Daylight Savings.

After answering a few questions, we exchanged the podium with Kalen Davison, also a senior, who proposed that the nets at the Beach tennis courts be raised to regulation height. Following Davison, PHS seniors Kaelli Thiel and Madison Tenney suggested adding a water fountain to Dracena Park.

Once Public Forum ended, Chair Totsubo introduced the main item on the agenda ­ the Lorita Avenue tree debate. As each speaker rose, the slight silence before speaking gave the otherwise commonplace topic the atmosphere of a performance.

First, residents Maggie and Lannie Spencer explained how ginkgo trees could replace the agapanthus flowers at the end of the cul­ de ­sac, emphasizing that they did not want “total uniformity” as to tree choice. Anne Hall, another resident, added that the trees should not develop potentially problematic roots ­and reminisced that she was quite young when the great trees were planted.

Suddenly remembering Twelfth Night ­ “when I was a little tiny boy…” I remembered a story about the pine tree my dad planted outside his lawn when he was very young, and how it still flourishes, a rare pine tree in that stretch of Indiana, a tree with significance as part of his Chinese name.

As the main item stretched into the 6:00 p.m. hour, some others suggested crepe myrtle at the end of the street, instead of trees. PHS Senior Devan Joseph, also a Lorita resident, succinctly supported planting ginkgo trees, “to make the whole cul­ de ­sac aesthetically pleasing.”

After Joseph’s speech, the discussion’s direction shifted and­ most of the speakers began to favor the trees.

Perhaps from my own experience, when a younger person speaks among many adults, somehow, the adults subconsciously agree with the youth, as a reflection of themselves. But without too much philosophy, once resident Andrew Coleman agreed to water the plants efficiently in this State of drought, the Commission seemed to be convinced.

Public Works Supervisor Dave Frankel spoke briefly about the botanical upsides of male ginkgo plants, including their slow growth rates, particularly in the Bay Area clay soil, and the lack of smelly fruits. Soothing as popular educational PBS shows, the tree lecture was the final piece of information needed to convince the Commission.

All Commission members, ­ Betsy Goodman, Jim Horner, Jonathan Levine, John Lehanan, Brian Mahany, Patty Siskind, and Chair Jamie Totsubo ­ approved the motion for new trees.

For the next hour, the commission addressed ongoing updates, including the Linda Kingston Triangle power from PG&E, and updates on Hampton Park. To lighten the detail ­heavy presentation, Chair Totsubo suddenly asked for recognition of the East Bay Garden Club’s Arbor Day celebration, and the PHS Jazz Band’s performance. A vague comment about students sent all but the PHS seniors into long laughter. At around 6:50 p.m., the meeting adjourned.

Interview with Nancy Kent, Parks and Projects Manager

At the end, Alex and I interviewed Nancy Kent, the staff liaison for the Commission. She spoke on how she began work with the City in a volunteer function, and through her voluntary role, she naturally transitioned into City government. Briefly outlining her concerns about water conservation, she highlighted the Commission’s role in Piedmont’s xeriscaping and rainwater reusal.

Kent ending by explaining to us the importance of local government in even the smallest issues, I noticed that everything ­ from the largest policy issues in Congress, the White House, and the Supreme Court ­ to even the swimming pool debates in Piedmont ­ can profoundly impact most people’s lives. Policy and politics often have less of an impact than the daily issues people debated in the Park Commission. We are lucky to be able to determine government at every level, through public discussion and debate.

Sam Cheng, Piedmont High School Senior

Editors’ Note:  Opinions expressed are those of the author.
May 13 2016

On May 4, 2016 at 5:30 pm, the Park Commission meeting commenced as Chair Jamie Totsubo called the participants to order and lead the Pledge of Allegiance. On the first Wednesday of every month, the Park Commission meets to address issues and come up with arrangements regarding the beautification of Piedmont; everything from the parks to the street landscaping. After Commissioners Brian Mahany, John Lenahan, Jim Horner, Jonathan Levine, Patty Siskind, and Betsy Goodman introduced themselves, the discussions began.

The meeting started off with the Public Forum, where several Piedmont High School students brought their concerns to the attention of the Commission. Sam Cheng and Alex Chueh requested that lights be put in around the softball field. Kalen Davison stated that the Linda tennis courts are in terrible condition, especially the nets, and suggested that the courts be checked every three months so as to keep them in a safe, playable condition.

After the Public Forum, the meeting moved on to address the items on the agenda, the first of which was a hearing to consider a request from residents Maggie and Lannie Spencer for the implementation of additional street trees on Lorita Avenue and Monticello Avenue. They proposed to remove the agapanthus on the street, and instead put in five new street trees.

Maggie Spencer brought up the point that there is a city owned space on the street that used to have street trees; however, these street trees were removed many years back and never replaced. Three other residents spoke in favor of street trees; one resident on Monticello Avenue later stated that they attended the meeting to make sure that their “opinions were being heard”, as they were “strongly in favor of beautifying the street.”

However, Anne Hall, a resident on Ramona Avenue, wanted to express her feelings against tall street trees, as they would block sunlight from her backyard and the roots going under her fence would be problematic.

I agree with this sentiment, as it is not often taken into consideration the tremendous barrier that tall trees can impose.

Therefore, the residents as well as the Commissioners agreed that the agapanthus should be substituted with a plant that grows the height of the fences, and does not spill over so as to disturb the neighbors. Commissioner Jim Horner stated that ginkgo trees stay small in a confined setting, and suggested to use ginkgos but keep the spacing narrow (about 20 feet apart). All of the Commissioners agreed on replacing the agapanthus with ginkgos, and the motion passed.

The Commission then moved on to the next items on the agenda, which included an update on the Linda/Kingston Triangle. They will soon be setting a date to put the drawings to bid, hopefully within the next month, so that the bulk of the project will be completed before school starts again in the Fall.

The next item involved the planting of a maple tree in Piedmont Park; the planting ceremony date is set for May 24, 2016 with the ceremonial planting beginning at 10 a.m.

The Park Commission also was given an update on the Hampton Master Plan; the project was awarded to Suarez and Munoz, a local group from Hayward. The project is to begin on June 13, the Monday after school lets out for summer, and the goal is to complete the project by August 16, the start of the 2016-­17 school year.

After the final item on the agenda (the monthly maintenance report), the Commission came to the decision that July 6 would be the date for their summer recess, and the meeting was adjourned.

Kaelli Thiel, Piedmont High School Senior

Editors’ Note: Opinions expressed are those of the author.
May 10 2016

On May 4, 2016, in the City Council Chambers the Piedmont Park Commission held its monthly Commission meeting, which was called to order at 5:30 p.m. by Chair Jamie Totsubo. The main item on the agenda to be discussed was the request from the residents of Lorita Avenue to replace plantings and trees on their cul de sac.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Before beginning the regular agenda, Chair Totsubo opened the meeting to those at the meeting for the Public Forum, where audience members can address any items not on the agenda. The Public Forum began with Sam Cheng and Alex Chueh, two seniors at Piedmont High School, who requested the addition of lights around the softball field.

They were followed by Kalen Davison, another senior at PHS, who asked for the nets to be periodically checked at the tennis courts, to make sure that they were still functional and at the correct height.

Davison was followed by Madison Tenney and Kaelli Thiel, two more students at PHS, who asked for a drinking fountain to be installed in Dracena Park. Once Tenney and Thiel concluded, Commissioner Totsubo moved onto the meeting’s regular agenda.

Lorita Avenue Trees and Plantings – 

To begin the regular agenda, Commissioner Totsubo opened up the meeting to the request from Lorita Avenue’s residents. Maggie and Lannie Spencer, the two petitioners for this topic, asked the Commission to plant street trees to replace the Agapanthus growing at the end of the cul de sac.

For this project, five new Ginkgo trees were offered by a developer in 24’’ boxes. The petitioners asked the city to use these new Ginkgos to infill among the existing Ginkgo trees, in addition to replacing the old Agapanthus.

Maggie Spencer elaborated that this was the perfect time for tree replacement and planting because of the large number of homes being remodelled along Lorita. She also informed the Commission that all of her neighbors had signed the request, and that the residents at 28 Lorita Avenue had pledged to water the new trees due to the lack of installed irrigation.

After Mrs. Spencer, several other residents spoke in favor of the new trees. Annie Hall, a neighbor to Lorita Avenue whose fence had previously been damaged by invasive trees, was in favor of the petition as long as the new tree didn’t block sunlight in her yard or have a large root system which could compromise her new fence.

Devan Joseph followed, voicing his support for the aesthetic benefits of newer greenery. He was followed by Andrew Coleman, the resident of 28 Lorita Avenue, who promised to water any new trees.

After hearing all of these comments, Commissioner Totsubo asked for the votes of her fellow commission members regarding the Spencer’s request. Each member ­ Betsy Goodman, Jim Horner, Jonathan Levine, John Lehanan, Brian Mahany, Patty Siskind, and Jamie Totsubo, herself­, were in favor; the motion for new trees on Lorita Avenue passed.

Once the decision was finalized, Chair Totsubo led the meeting through the five remaining agenda topics, including four updates on completed and future parks projects, and the monthly maintenance report.

Dracena Park Drinking Fountain for Dogs and People –

During the meeting, Kaelli Thiel and I spoke about the lack of accessible water in Dracena Park for both parkgoers and their dogs. Currently, there is only one drinking fountain by the swingset in the lower playground area, and a waterfall faucet in the sandpit. Although dogs could use the latter for water, many parents are uncomfortable having larger pets around their children.

Since the trail around Dracena Park is fairly long, and the walk to the fountains is off of the dog trail itself, Kaelli and I proposed the installation of a dual drinking fountain with a lower dog dish and faucet for dogs, and an upper fountain for people. We asked for it to replace the orange cooler which currently acts as the dog’s drinking faucet along the upper walk of Dracena Park, allowing for a permanent and accessible source of water along Dracena’s trail.

Madison Tenney, Piedmont High School Senior

Editors’ Note: Opinions expressed are those of the author.
May 7 2016

  Beach and Coaches Field, Blair and Dracena Park, Community Center, Lights on Oakland Avenue Bridge – Capital projects get in line for City funding. 

On Tuesday, May 10, the Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) Review Committee will meet at 6:00 p.m. in the City Hall Conference Room to prioritize funding recommendations for new capital projects.  The Committees’ recommendations will be presented to the City Council at their Budget Work Session on Saturday, May 21, 2016*, in the Arts Center Building across from Piedmont High School.  * May 21 is the corrected date of the Council Budget Work Session. 

The meeting of the CIP Committee is open to the public. There will be no broadcast or recording of the meeting.  Interested individuals can follow the recommendation process and speak to the Committee on the projects at the May 10 meeting.

Proposed project details were not publicly disseminated as of this publication. The City has notified select individuals and organizations about the meeting.

The May 10 agenda includes:

1. Review of May 7, 2016 CIP Site Tour

2. Discussion of Final Project Descriptions

3. Discussion of Final Report and Recommendations for City Council

Individuals seeking information on the projects should contact:

Parks and Project Manager Nancy Kent at 420-3064 or  nkent@ci.piedmont.ca.us 

The Council will decide on the final priorities and possible funding.