Feb 27 2015

A special City Council meeting will provide training on the role of elected officials in a disaster.

Piedmont’s City Council will have an unusual Saturday meeting at 10 a.m. Saturday, February 28 in the Emergency Operation Center in the Police Department on Highland Avenue. The sole agenda item is the training of Council members on the role of elected officials in disaster response.

Presumably, the meeting will not be recorded or broadcast for offsite viewing. However, it is a public meeting and the public may attend.  Read the agenda.

 

Feb 27 2015

A community work day will be held Saturday, February, 28 from 10 a.m. to noon in Blair Park to clean off ivy and weed around the oak trees at the base of the hillside.   Everyone (except children under 12) is invited, wearing work gloves and bringing clippers and rakes if they have them.   Refreshments and snacks will be on hand. Street parking is available on Moraga Avenue at the upper end of the park.

The Piedmont Public Works Department will pick up the piles of clippings after the event.  Neighbors have been working with City staff to set up regular maintenance in the park and to do the work approved by the City Council in Phase 1 of the Blair Park landscape improvement plan.  The City plans to remove more of the diseased pine trees along Moraga Avenue, with the goal of encouraging the oaks that are growing beneath them.

The event is sponsored by Friends of Moraga Canyon. Visit www.moragacanyon.org for more information.

Feb 27 2015

Forty five candidates applied for the Superintendent of Schools position.

The following information was provided by School Board Member Doug Ireland.

“The PUSD board met in a special session on February 24 as part of the ongoing superintendent search. In open session HYA advisors Barbara Young and Bill Levinson reviewed logistics and protocols for the upcoming candidate interviews. We will conduct two days of formal interviews next week. From that group, we will narrow the field and move on to a second set of interviews the following week.

“In closed session we were given our first briefing on the pool of candidates. Forty-five completed applications were submitted by candidates from eight states. It is a diverse group with a broad range of degrees and areas of expertise. Our consultants conducted interviews with 14 of those candidates, narrowed down the list, and gave us detailed briefs of the slate of candidates they identified as most qualified for the position.

“The board has been reminded of the need for absolute confidentiality as regards our pool of candidates. We thank you for your understanding and confidence in the process.”

Feb 23 2015

The Piedmont City Council will meet on Wednesday, February 25 with a closed session in the City Hall Conference Room beginning at 5:30 p.m. to evaluate the City Administrator.  Following the closed session, the Council will have a public meeting with one agenda item in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 120 Vista Avenue.

The single agenda item in the public session is consideration of modification to the Conditions of Approval for a new home at 53 Cambrian Avenue. The project was originally approved by the Council in 2009.  Read the staff report.

The meeting will be live streamed and broadcast on KCOM Channel 27.

Feb 23 2015
The Piedmont Unified School District’s new superintendent search moves ahead as the School Board will review candidates and select those they will soon interview.
The Board of Education meeting on Tuesday, February 24 will be held in the City Hall Council Chambers with a closed session starting at 8:00 a.m. continuing to an open session between 8:30 a.m. and 11:00 a.m., which will be live streamed and televised via KCOM Channel 27.
The open agenda includes consideration of bond refunding intended to save taxpayers approximately $4 million over the term of the bonds.
The Board will also Review Interview Protocols with their superintendent search consultants Bill Levinson and Barbara Young from Hazard, Young, Attea & Associates, who will review the interview process for the selection of the new Superintendent. The review will include the schedule, timeline and logistics.
Closed Session
At around 11:00 a.m. following the Open Session, the Board will go into a Closed Session to work with their consultant on the Superintendent search to select candidates to be interviewed. Closed sessions on personnel matters are allowed by State law to provide candidates private consideration of their applications.
The following information is provided for the public regarding the process.
“This week is an exciting one for the board in our process to identify and retain a new superintendent. The board will hold a special Board meeting Tuesday February 24, much of which will involve the search process. The open segment will review how we intend to proceed with the interview portion of the search and protocols required in that process. In closed session, we will hear from our consultants about the slate of candidates they propose we move to the next stage.
“Now begins the hard part. We have a formal document that outlines the overall job description for the superintendent of a California school district. This document is part of PUSD Board Policy. That is attached for your review. We also must look for and balance those characteristics which we, as a school community, have determined are requisite to succeed in Piedmont. And finally, we need to incorporate any intangibles which we believe will contribute to the success of our selection and the continued excellence of our school district.
“The board is excited to begin this phase of the search. We are buoyed by the support  of our community and guided by our obligation of stewardship in this vital choice.
        Thank you.”
Submitted by School Board Member Doug Ireland
Feb 23 2015

Piedmont Police Department Press release:

“On February 18, 2015 at 04:39 hours Piedmont Police Department Officers contacted a suspicious vehicle which suddenly had stopped in a residential driveway on York Drive in Piedmont.  The driver of the vehicle, later identified as (S) AMANDA VETA, exited the vehicle and approached the officer.  While VETA spoke with the officer a subject, later identified as parolee-at-large DEVON PARTEE, fled from the vehicle and avoided arrest.  (S) ALLUZES SATORRE was seated in the front passenger seat.

“Both VETA and SATORRE were active to Alameda County probation with search conditions of their person/vehicle/property.  SATORRE was found to be in possession of methamphetamine.  Additional methamphetamine and marijuana was also found inside the vehicle.  Numerous pieces of unopened mail, opened mail, and an opened package were found within the vehicle from several addresses both in Piedmont and Oakland.

“SATORRE and VETA were both booked in at Santa Rita Jail for possession of stolen property, theft and possession of methamphetamine.

“PARTEE was not located.”

   Piedmont Police Department

403 Highland Avenue

Piedmont, CA 94611

Residents are asked to call 420-3000 when observing suspicious activities.

Feb 23 2015

Student Report on the School Board Meeting of February 11, 2015 by Ami Felson

On the calm evening of February 11th, 2015, I set out to visit the Piedmont Unified School District (PUSD) Board of Education Meeting, which meets on the second and fourth Wednesday of every month in the Council Chambers located at City Hall (120 Vista Avenue, Piedmont, CA, 94611). The purpose of these meetings is to make sure that the Piedmont Unified Schools are successfully creating a safe, educational, and pleasant school experience for all students in the district.

The most time prominent agenda items discussed at this particular meeting included the presentation from the director of KNN Public Finance discussing the board’s options for the refunding of 2006 series A and B general obligation bonds along with the Common Core standards of mathematics pathways and the revised reading of Social Psychology curriculum.

For the bond refunding presentation, Blake Boehm, Director of KNN Public Finance, presented a PowerPoint presentation to the board as Board Member Doug Ireland explained the technical financial terms to the audience watching. Randall Booker presented the Common Core standards for mathematics from higher elementary school up until the brink of high school graduation.

Hillary Cooper stood up as a parent of an eighth and ninth grader to agree with the fact that all sixth graders should be in the same math course and should be tested on mathematic advancement later on in middle school or early in high school.

Lisa Joyce, a parent of a tenth grader, thought that in order to implement these Common Core classes we need statistical analysis from Middle Schoolers to see what they want and what will work best for them.

Jessica Burg, another parent, wondered how the mathematic prerequisites would alter what science classes students are able to take.

Kalla Krokowski, a sixth grader from Beach Elementary School, stated that she wanted to be challenged with the math classes that she took because she was bored a lot of the time in class with simple problems that her teachers have consistently assigned.

Julie Kasky, an alumni of the Math Task Force, noted that she would like she would the board members to publicly inform members in the Piedmont community regarding these Common Core considerations.

Lastly, Larry Haukens, a Piedmont student parent and Math Task Force member, recognized that this is a big decision and the entire School Board needs to critically think about this dramatic change to the school curriculum. Additionally, Piedmont Unified School District Board Members Rick Raushenbush, Doug Ireland, Amal Smith, Sarah Pearson, Andrea Swenson, Constance Hubbard, Michael Brady, and Randall Booker commented on copious issues throughout the evening.

One issue that caught my attention at the meeting was definitely the issue regarding having a Social Psychology class offered in the summer. Although Mrs. Pearson thought that if enough sophomores signed up for the class it would create that inclusive and special community that the class already creates during the school year, I believe that many students will miss out on a big part of what the class offers.

One aspect of the class consists of giving random classmates presents outside of class just to emanate kindness.  I don’t see how that can be done without having every student go to another student’s house, which can just lead to much chaos and disorder. Also, students learn the most from this class by talking to each other and reacting on what happened in class every day after class, and it is nearly impossible to do that if the students are home playing video games instead of passing by each other in the hallways during passing period, where conversation is far more casual.

I figured out that Mr. Doug Ireland chose to become a part of the PUSD Board of Education because he “wanted to make sure that this Common Core roll out worked well” and make sure that “we can honestly talk about ten year, evaluation, what [the teachers are] doing, and how well they’re doing it” and “[he] thinks they’re under-appreciated”, so he wants to make sure that they get acknowledgement for all the hard work they put into their jobs every day.

Ireland is “actively going to outside sources from other districts, people who [he] know[s] in the world of education to get [him] educated around teaching” and he’s “visited all the sites…to get first-hand views on what’s happening in the classrooms so that [he] can have an educated perspective which [he] can bring to the board”.

During the meeting, I decided to question what happened to the old PC computers that were replaced a little while ago with new Macintosh ones in the Piedmont High School library. Randall Booker responded by saying that they were all put to E-waste because they weren’t very robust.

Doug Ireland questioned why I’m asking that particular question and I explained that I am a member of Friends of the Oakland Public School Libraries, which refurbishes Oakland School Libraries that have been nothing more than empty rooms for a long while. Volunteers put barcodes on donated books, enter them into the system, shelve them, etc.

One crucial part I forgot to mention is that the reason why I was asking was because I thought that these schools could’ve used these computers if the old PCs were still in storage, but clearly since they’re not, that information has no use to getting them nicer computers.

Also, I mentioned that there are several issues with the male restrooms including the lack of locks on the stalls, irregularly refilled soap dispensers, and one broken hand dryer. Overall, speaking out to the board was a little difficult because I only had one opportunity to state everything that I wanted to say and there was so much going through my mind at the time that it was pretty hard to do so. Nevertheless, going to the meeting opened my eyes to how members of our Piedmont community collaboratively meet twice a month to bring up, discuss, and solve current hot- topic issues in our school district.

Ami Felson, Piedmont High School Student

Editors’ Note:  The opinions expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the Piedmont Civic Association.
Feb 23 2015

– Student Report on the Planning Commission Meeting of February 9, 2015 by Kevin Shum –

The City of Piedmont Planning Commission met for a Regular Session on Monday, February 9, 2015 at 5:02 pm in the City Hall Council Chambers. The Planning Commission meets regularly on the second Monday of each month to discuss and evaluate proposed home construction and remodeling plans, and serve as advisors to the City Council regarding city planning.

The first house on the agenda was 53 Cambrian Avenue. The property owners requested reconsideration of the conditions of approval needed to construct a new 4,347 square-foot house that had been approved back in 2009. However, residents who live nearby voiced their concerns about possible soil subsidence during construction and the protection of neighboring properties.

Homeowner Caryl James wanted to ensure that her home would be covered to the fullest extent throughout the construction process. David Bowie, the attorney representing the homeowner, made certain that the soil conditions have remained unchanged and will provide the report produced by a soil engineer to the City.

The Commissioners supported the staff recommendation published back in 2009, based on the fact that current city standards are consistent with those six years ago and that no changes have been reported on site. If any problems arise during or after the construction process, recourse would be applicable. In this situation, homeowners would have the right to sue for compensation for any damages caused.

The next item on the agenda was a variance and design review of the remodeling of 74 Sea View Avenue. The homeowner spoke for a proposed a new 3-car garage, instead of a 4-car garage required by the City, as the property is large enough to accommodate other cars and, because of the large size of the property, there is ample space for street parking. In addition, two of the bedrooms, the homeowner noted, are not suited or intended to be counted as bedrooms — one is a hunting lodge, the other is a game room — so a 4-car garage is unnecessary. Consequently, the Commission debated whether or not the homeowner should be required to build a larger garage.

Commissioners Susan Ode, Tom Zhang, and Louise Simpson were against the parking variance, as the lot provides more than enough space for a larger garage. As a solution, the Commission decided that the 3 car garage be moved an additional foot to allow a fourth uncovered carport parking space.

The owner also proposed other stylistic remodeling and additions, such as new decks, changes to the roof, and landscape improvements. Commissioner Simpson was especially concerned about the removal of much of the mature landscaping that opens up much of the property to street view and a proposed metal roof. The Commissioners concluded that a landscaping plan will be necessary before a permit is issued and a dark, non-reflective metal roof to be installed.

The third item brought forth for discussion was a remodeling of 110 Maxwelton Road. The homeowner and architect requested variances for the front and side yard setback due of size and sloping nature of the lot, a conversion of the carport into an enclosed garage, and an entry deck to ensure proper and safe access to house.

Commissioner Zhang applauded the effort to improve the current parking condition and the addition of a deck to provide good outdoor space and a safe entry into the house. The other Commissioners also agreed that the designs sent in were perfectly suited for the unconforming nature of the property, and that the homeowners plan to preserve the mature redwoods situated in front of the property which will provide softness to house. Commissioner Simpson also pointed out that without the variances, it would be impossible to make the improvements, and that the design proposals align with the aesthetics of the neighborhood. The Commission unanimously supported the homeowner’s requests for variances.

The final major item that the Commission discussed was a proposed demolition of a greenhouse and a construction of a new structure on the property of 30 Prospect Road. In discussing with homeowner Annie Reding before the item was brought forth to the Commission, I learned that this was her second attempt at requesting the needed permits to build a studio due to various complaints from residing neighbors regarding the unwelcome structure in their neighborhood. She stated that she and her husband worked with their architect in the last few months and is here to ameliorate their neighbors’ concerns regarding the project and to present the revised designs to the Commission. This time around, she hopes to have her variances and permits issued so that they will finally be able to move forward with the project.

Redding’s husband, Ajay Krishnan, expressed to the Commission that the studio would serve as an office, in which he will work from home, and a guest house. Architect Ian Reed demonstrated that the revised design addresses their neighbor’s concerns — for example, the proposed structure has been decreased in square footage and lowered in height, has opaque windows, and has lower vantage points. Reed assured that the new design addresses the concern of blockage of view.

However, this project still faced stiff opposition from neighbors. Neighbor Jean Zee was opposed to the massive structure, listed at 317 feet, which she says is too large for an office, and obstructs her view. In addition to requesting opaque glass be installed on all sides of the structure, she is concerned that the studio will become a one bedroom house in future.

Neighbor Blake Wong lives directly across street and reiterated the same concerns—that the project is too big for neighborhood, and there is not another structure like this in this size and nature in neighborhood.  However, Commissioners were in full support of the project, as the revised proposal is much improved and addresses the neighbors initial concerns adequately.

Commissioner Simpson applauded the fantastic modifications and even suggested the kitchen be put back in order to create a second unit, which Piedmont is encouraging right now. Commissioner Tony Theophilos thought the revisions went above and beyond to address neighbors’ concerns and that the architect implemented creative and original solutions regarding the decreased size and other design modifications to the structure.

In my opinion, I also support this project. In talking with the homeowner, I realized how much time and effort was put into remediating the neighbors’ complaints. It is important to note that there is an existing structure on the property, and the new structure would replace that. I feel that the neighbors’ concerns are unfounded based on the revised plans. Not only does the structure blend in with the property, but it is a logical upgrade for the homeowners.

Kevin Shum, Piedmont High School Student

Editors’ Note:  The opinions expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the Piedmont Civic Association.
Feb 20 2015

During the search for a new Superintendent of Piedmont Schools, the School Board has been barraged with questions in the reports and editorials of a local newspaper.  Most recently, there has been a claim that there is no job description for the position.  In response to the concern and questions, the office of the Piedmont Superintendent has released the following statement and information describing the Superintendent’s responsibilities and duties:

Please see clarification for the “job description” of the Superintendent of Schools as it applies to California public school districts. The duties of the Superintendent are outlined as part of the District’s Board Policies and are governed by that and regulations as included in the California Educational Code. Additional duties may be included as part of the contract between the Superintendent and Board of Education.
Please see the attached Policies for the Piedmont Unified School District as to the role, responsibility and duties of the Superintendent of Schools. Any additional requests for information or questions may be directed to the office of the Superintendent or to the Board of Education President.
Andrea SwensonPresident
Constance Hubbard, Superintendent of Schoolschubbard@piedmont.k12.ca.us   594-2614

Click the link below to read the Superintendent Job Description:

Duties of Sup 215

Feb 20 2015

– Piedmont Unified School District announces the Nomination Period for the 2015 Arthur Hecht Volunteer of the Year Award. –

This award is presented annually to individuals who have volunteered their efforts over a period of time and made a difference because of their involvement and commitment to Piedmont’s youth.

Following are the previous recipients: Hunter McCreary (1998); Ann Chandler (1999); Ruth Cuming (2000); Lisa Lomenzo (2001); jointly by Cathie Geddeis and Marion Souyoultzis (2002); jointly by Fritz and Mary Wooster (2003); Elizabeth (Betsy) Gentry (2004); Cynthia Gorman (2005); Grier Graff (2006); Julia Burke (2007); Maude Pervere (2008); jointly to Anne‐Marie Lamarche and Mark Menke (2009); Janiele Maffei Tovani (2010); Andrea Swenson (2011), June Monach (2012), Bill Drum (posthumously) and Mary Ireland  (2013), and Ray Perman (2014).

Art Hecht was a tireless community volunteer, and was dedicated to students in both Piedmont and Oakland. He served on Piedmont’s Board of Education from 1970 to 1982. Art also was very active with the Piedmont Continuation High School (now called Millennium High School). In 1998, the Art Hecht Volunteer of the Year Award was established in his memory.

Nominations for this award are now being sought and will be kept strictly confidential. The deadline for nominations is 4:30 p.m. on March 16, 2015. A selection committee will vote on the award recipient, who will be recognized at the May 13, 2015 Board of Education meeting, where the honoree’s good works can be acknowledged. They also will receive the gift of a work of student art. The student will receive a monetary award and commendation from the Board.

Nomination form. < Return the form to the Piedmont Unified School District office at 760 Magnolia Avenue, Piedmont, CA 94611 

Email questions to Sandy Spiker at sspiker@piedmont.k12.ca.us.