Mar 22 2016

The current contract with “Code Red,” Piedmont’s emergency notification system, runs through April 2016, but the City began using “AC Alert” in August 2015.  Alameda County cities use a variety of different mass notification systems. For example, Berkeley uses BENS, Berkeley Emergency Notification System. The Alameda County Grand Jury >Final Report <2012 – 2013 mandated the County to obtain a mass emergency notification system. “AC Alert” is the result of this mandate.

The three bomb attacks in Brussels this week are a reminder to prepare for emergencies. In Brussels cell phone service was unavailable much of the day.

The City of Piedmont is transitioning from “Code Red”

to “AC Alert.”

Announcement:  “AC Alert” is a county wide emergency notification system that allows you to opt in to notifications not only in the community in which you reside, but in up to 5 other locations (i.e.-work, daycare, school, surrounding cities).

Click here to sign up – it only takes about a minute to enroll!

How Will You Stay Informed About Emergencies?

Your safety is the top concern – that is why the City of Piedmont wants to make sure you know about emergencies and incidents as they happen.

The City of Piedmont will use “AC Alert” powered by Everbridge to make sure you know about issues that may affect your safety. This system allows the City of Piedmont to contact thousands of residents in seconds so you can find out about an emergency right away.

Residents will receive important messages from city officials via email, phone, and much more!

How Does It Work?

The process begins when the City of Piedmont issues a message about a potential safety hazard or concern. Next, “AC Alert” sends a message through your primary contact path. If you do not confirm receipt of the message, the system will try to reach your second contact path and continues trying to reach you until you confirm receipt.

The success of this service relies on YOU.

You must go to the “AC Alert” sign up page and enroll. Click below.

Click >for sign up – it only takes about a minute to enroll! <

Your information cannot be transferred from “Code Red” to “AC Alert.” Having your latest contact information is the only way to ensure that we can contact you in an emergency.

“Piedmont Respects Your Privacy!!”

“The City of Piedmont will never share or distribute your personal information, unless required to do so by law. Additionally, we will never use your information for any purpose other than to send emergency notifications or information pertaining to Piedmont.”


If you are interested in organizing, hosting, or attending a neighborhood safety meeting, please go to the > Public Safety Committee’s page <and enter your information. You will be contacted by a member of the committee who will give you information on setting up a meeting.


Mar 17 2016

City Council to Discuss Dracena Park Off-Leash Issue

Monday, March 21st – 7:30 p.m.

 City Council Chamber, 120 Vista Avenue

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council will discuss the Park Commission’s February 3, 2016 recommendation regarding the Off-Leash Area at Dracena Park at its regular meeting on Monday, March 21, 2016 at 7:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, located in City Hall,120 Vista Avenue.

The Park Commission held several meetings on this issue in 2015 and heard public testimony and made a recommendation to the City Council at their meeting of February 3, 2016. The video of that meeting is available on the City’s web site at http://www.ci.piedmont.ca.us/video

The matter will be heard by the City Council at their regular meeting.   The meeting will be broadcast live on Cable Channel 27 and on the City website at http://www.ci.piedmont.ca.us/video.

Staff report on Dracena Park <

You are invited to attend the City Council meeting and express your opinion.  Alternatively, you may choose to write your opinion and address the response to the Piedmont City Council, c/o City Clerk, 120 Vista Avenue, Piedmont, CA  94611 or send an e-mail to cityclerk@ci.piedmont.ca.us.

Council Agenda for March 21  <

For further information, contact Parks and Project Manager Nancy Kent at (510) 420-3064 or nkent@ci.piedmont.ca.us.

Mar 17 2016

160 Piedmont residents signed support of ratifying the policy for climate change –

March 7th City Council Meeting Report –

    At 7:00 pm on March 7th, 2016, Mayor of Piedmont, Margaret Fujioka, called the City Council meeting to order. Twice a month, on the first and third Mondays of the month, the Council comes together in a meeting to address current issues of Piedmont and the possible resolutions to those problems at City Hall Council Chambers, 120 Vista Avenue.

    This meeting was not the regular first and third Monday of the month type of meeting, the main purpose of the meeting was for Mayor Fujioka to give her second State of the City Address since her election. The meeting started the way they always do, with a call to order, pledge of allegiance, and approval of the council meeting minutes for February 16th, 2016.

    Ten minutes were then granted to the public to speak about issues they see in Piedmont. These ten minutes were divided equally among all of those who wanted speak in the audience. Eight people filled out speaking cards, so each person got a minute and fifteen seconds. The majority of those speaking in front of the City Council were speaking to the subject of climate change and solutions to the problem that the city of Piedmont can help with. The majority of those who spoke out about climate change, including Julie Walsh who collected 160 names of Piedmont residents in support of ratifying the current policy for climate change, gave information and reasoning on why CalPERS should move away from fossil fuels for environmental as well as financial reasons. I agree with what was stated in the meeting about climate change being a pressing issue the City of Piedmont needs to address. The benefits to green fuels are better than those of fossil fuels. Chris Seybold spoke out about the issues of Oakland Ave and the unsafety of its crosswalks, proposing to calm traffic at the crosswalks. I spoke along with Hannah Castle about student parking. So many people drive to school and with that, parking is already very limited. There are a variety of people who drive to school where they can walk instead. We proposed that students who live within a 20 minute walk not be issued a permit, and therefore students who live farther than that be granted a student permit. The only issue I encountered in this idea was where the permitted parking would be placed as most of the areas students park are within residential areas.

    After the ten minutes of Public Forum ended, the Council moved on to Mayor Fujioka’s second State of the City Address. The address started with an acknowledgment to the renovated City Hall entry way by thanking Piedmont Beautification Foundation as well as the employees of the city for their cooperation. Mayor Fujioka then brought up the four issues she brought up in her first address; improving public safety, maintaining fiscal health, embracing technology, and addressing aging infrastructure. Public safety has been a big priority for Piedmont, and with the help of Police Chief Rikki Goede and Fire Chief Bud McLaren, Piedmont is safer than it was just a year ago with crime rates down and an increase of disaster preparedness.

Throughout the last few years, Piedmont has remained fiscally healthy with cost-saving measures which also will help generate revenue for the city and to continue embracing technology, a five-year Information Technology Strategic Plan was adopted in October 2015 and the next step for the plan is to employ IT staff for support. To address the aging infrastructure, Mayor Fujioka brought up the parcel tax and commended its support of Piedmont residents and discussed the increase of the tax on the June ballot. Mayor Fujioka ended the address with stating the strong connection the City has with PUSD. She promised to continue to keep the four initiatives listed above as her priorities moving forward in her term.

    I spoke with Paisley Strellis after the meeting about her role in the audience. She said that she attends every City Council meeting and then writes the summary of the meetings for The Piedmont Post in order to keep all of Piedmont up to date on the happenings of each meeting.

By Megan Deutsche, Piedmont High School senior

 Editors’ Note:  Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Feb 29 2016

An Opportunity to Serve Your Community!

Vacancies on Piedmont’s commissions and committees offer an excellent opportunity for Piedmonters to get involved in Piedmont activities important to the ongoing success and quality of the City.  These citizen volunteer positions allow individuals to use their abilities on a wide range of subjects.  Being on a commission or committee engages a person in a high level of civic involvement.

Each commission has a special role in making decisions and advising the City Council.  A full term on a commission last for 3 years with a two term limit.  Positions without an incumbent are ready opportunities for new participants.

Interested residents may download the Application for Appointive Vacancy. Applications are due to City Hall on or before the deadline of Thursday, March 17, 2016.

Budget Advisory & Financial Planning Committee 3 Vacancies 3 Incumbents
CIP Review Committee 1 Vacancy 0 Incumbents
Civil Service Commission 2 Vacancies 2 Incumbents
Park Commission 3 Vacancies 2 Incumbents
Planning Commission 3 Vacancies 3 Incumbents
Public Safety Committee 2 Vacancies 2 Incumbents
Recreation Commission 3 Vacancies 0 Incumbents

Interviews with the City Council for these positions will be scheduled for Tuesday, March 22, 2016. No appointments will be made without a Council interview.

Feb 13 2016

Honoring President’s Day and delaying their meeting one day, the City Council will convene on Tuesday, February 16 at 7 p.m. in a Closed Session with legal counsel in the City Hall Conference Room to discuss litigation concerning Harris & Associates, the engineering firm instrumental in the failed and costly private underground utility district.

At 7:30 p.m. the City Council will begin its Open Session in the Council Chambers, with the Consent Calendar:  approve Council liaison assignments, approve catastrophic leave donations for Firefighter David Abernethy, and authorize a settlement with Harris and Associates in the amount $417,000.

Next the Council will take up its regular agenda, including the 2014-15 Audit Report, 2015 Piedmont Crime Report, Police Computer Upgrade in the amount $426,205, Emergency Operations Plan Update, Midyear Fiscal 2015-16 Report, and Midyear Appropriations increasing budgeted expenditures by $964, 250.

The meeting is open to the public, broadcast live.  A copy of the meeting will be retained in the city’s archives.

Read the agenda.

Staff reports:

Council liaison assignments for 2016

Catastrophic leavdonation

Settlement agreement with engineers Harris & Associates

Audit Report

Year End Crime Report

Dispatch Software Purchase

Emergency Operations Plan

Mid-year Financial Report

Mid-year Additional Appropriations 

Feb 6 2016

The Piedmont City / School Liaison Committee will consider topical subjects impacting both the City and School District.  Consensus is frequently reached in an open exchange of information. Decisions are not finalized during the meeting, as they must be referred to the appropriate elected body for action.  Individuals interested in the subjects can participate at the meeting.

Tuesday, February 9, 2016

4:00 p.m.

City Hall Conference Room, 120 Vista Avenue, Piedmont, CA

The meeting is open to the public.  The meeting will not be broadcast or recorded for future viewing. Agenda:

  • 1. Update on the PUSD Facilities Master Planning Process
  •  2. Discussion of City Parcel Tax on the June 7 Presidential Primary Election Ballot
  •   3. Discussion of Pick-Up / Drop-Off Zone at High School and Middle School
  •   4. Discussion of Plans for Full Day Kindergarten and its Impact to Schoolmates and Opportunities for Cooperation 

Materials for the meeting have not been publicly disseminated, however they can be obtained at the meeting or prior to the meeting through the City or the Piedmont Unified School District.

Jan 23 2016

$3,000 available for earthquake work to qualifying homeowners.

The Earthquake Brace + Bolt (EBB) program provides homeowners up to a maximum of $3,000 for approved construction projects to strengthen their foundation. Homeowners who are accepted in the EBB program are required to agree to and adhere to the full Program Rules and Terms of Use posted on the website. (Read the 15 page Rules and Terms here.)

The EBB program requires adherence to the California Building Code, Appendix Chapter A3, which sets prescriptive standards for seismic retrofits of existing residential buildings.

Homeowner registration is open until February 20 to apply for participation in the program. Homeowners will be notified via email if they have been selected or if they are on the wait list. Selected homeowners will receive detailed information and next steps for participation in EBB.

Highlights of qualifications for homeowners :

  • Homeowner must be the owner of record and live in the house that will be retrofitted.

  • The house must meet the structural requirements of a Chapter A3 retrofit which is done completely in the crawl space around the perimeter of the foundation.

    1. For houses with cripple walls 4-feet or less, a contractor or homeowner may complete the retrofit using an approved standard plan set.
    2. For houses with cripple walls taller than 4-feet an engineered solution is required.
  • The house must not have a completed brace and bolt retrofit previous to being accepted into EBB.

  • The building permit must be received and dated after acceptance into EBB.

  • The building permit must state the retrofit is in accordance with Chapter A3. If the retrofit is an engineered solution, then the signed and stamped letter from the engineer must state the retrofit is in accordance with Chapter A3.

  • In addition to the brace and bolt retrofit the work must include strapping the water heater.

  • The homeowner must meet all program deadlines and submit the required documentation.

  • The house must successfully pass a final inspection by a local building inspector, confirming the retrofit was done in accordance with Chapter A3.

     

Jan 8 2016

Garrett Keating contends the City will have adequate revenue without the jump up in the Parcel Tax rate and funds are needed for school improvements.

In his last published column, Councilman Jeff Wieler challenged readers to propose changes to municipal services in lieu of supporting the proposed increase in the parcel tax.  To have that discussion, it would be nice if the Councilman stopped his harangue of others who don’t share his views.  The ink isn’t even dry on the proposal and Councilman Wieler already characterizes other views as “perverse” and negative.  

The basis of his column is the proposal from the Budget Advisory and Financial Planning Committee (BAFPC) that the annual parcel tax be raised by as much as 50%.  BAFPC analyzed the city’s facility maintenance needs and conservatively estimates that $0.5M is needed annually for deferred maintenance. Likewise, the city recently completed a review of its information technology and found that conservatively $0.5M is needed annually to upgrade its IT systems.  As an aside, these are “spreadsheet spending” analyses that need more work before they are used as the basis for a tax increase.  So a 50% increase in the annual $1.8M parcel tax brings in about the $1M needed to start facility maintenance and IT upgrades.    

The basis for the BAFPC recommendation is a projection showing that implementing this new spending will deplete the General Fund reserve by 2020. The BAFPC estimates that over this 5-year period, annual transfer tax revenues will be $2.8M, the average value for the transfer tax from the past 10 years.  Alternatively, using the 25-year trend in transfer tax increase, the tax has increased 10% annually to its present day value of $3.9M.  At that rate, the transfer tax will tax be $6.3M by 2020.  Even at 5%, the transfer tax will be $4.5M in 2020.  Transfer tax revenues for the past three years have been $3.2, $4.0 and $3.9M, respectively.

And there is no estimate in the BAFPC projection for the increase in revenue from property reassessment nor tax revenue from 8 new residences coming to Piedmont.  For example, there are 1000 properties in Piedmont assessed under $500,000 and if just 5% of those sold for $2M today (median 2015 Piedmont price), those sales alone would generate close to $1M in new revenue.  This property tax increase, coupled with the 25-year trend in the transfer tax growth, could likely exceed the revenue the BAFPC proposes to collect with the new tax.

As it happens, at its Monday meeting, the Council chose to go with only a 30% increase in the parcel tax, raising $500K annually with an increase of about $150 for the average Piedmont household.  The parcel tax increase will be on the June 2016 primary ballot and Piedmonters should review the BAFPC report and recommendations available on the city website:(http://www.ci.piedmont.ca.us/html/govern/staffreports/2015-12-07/parceltaxreport.pdf). 

As the debate heats up, consider these points. First, disregard any statements that not voting for the tax increase will lead to a reduction in public safety.  City reserve funds are at their maximum and the current parcel tax carries on until June 2017, leaving ample time to renew the tax should it fail in June.  References to cuts in public safety are simple fear-mongering.  Second, the spending estimates that justify the tax have not been fully researched and may be overstated.   As an example, estimates that the Sewer Tax needed to be increased by 50% were subsequently found to be inaccurate.  

Finally, Piedmont Unified School District (PUSD) is currently conducting a facilities assessment and will likely have a ballot initiative on the November 2016 ballot.   I hope the School Board brings forward a proposal to not only maintain school facilities but to modernize them.  Science and media laboratories, performance spaces and classrooms have all been identified as needing upgrades. 

Actually, maintaining the status quo with the city parcel tax and encouraging residents to support new school revenue might be the best strategy for the city.  Demand for Piedmont schools drives up housing prices leading to the historic increases in the city’s transfer tax receipts.

Councilman Wieler misses the point.  Opponents of the proposed tax increase don’t oppose better city services, they just don’t see why the tax need be increased when current and projected revenue will do the job.  Rather than argue about cuts, maybe we should be discussing revenues.

Garrett Keating, Former Piedmont City Councilmember

Editors’ Note: Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Jan 6 2016

Piedmont resident responds to the City Council approved changes to the traffic island area at the intersection of Highland and Magnolia Avenues: 

The new traffic pattern established last week by eliminating the drop off at Magnolia and Highland Avenues (Blue Vase at the Excedra)  is a disaster.  Parents are dropping off kids at the Wells Fargo Bank, creating a back up there two and three cars wide.  And the traffic line to drop off kids at Piedmont Middle School is incessant.  I know it has been raining all week, but this will still be a problem after the rain stops.
I propose turning Bonita Avenue between Magnolia Avenue (at Piedmont High School) and Vista Avenue into a two way street.  I realize this would eliminate some parking spots along that strip, but would create another drop off spot for students at all three schools.
 Alison Avagliano,  Piedmont Resident
 Editors’ Note:  Opinions expressed are those of the author.

Read prior article about the changes to the intersection.

Jan 3 2016

City Council Meeting – January 4, 2016 –

To Fill a Planning Commission vacancy, a Special Meeting will be convened at 6 p.m. in the City Hall Conference Room.

~~~~~~~~~~~

A Special Meeting will be convened at 6 p.m. in open session in the City Hall Conference Room to consider filling the vacancy on the Planning Commission. The opening is a result of the recent resignation of Commissioner Phillip Chase.  No staff report on the vacancy or public notification soliciting applicants is available. The Special Meeting will not be broadcast nor recorded, however, it is open to the public.  Piedmont’s City Charter states that Special Meetings may be called by the Mayor or three or more members of the Council with 24 hours notice.

The regular meeting will be convened at 6:30 p.m. with a Closed Session, also in the City Hall Conference Room on two subjects: performance evaluation of the City Administrator and litigation with Harris & Associates.

At 7:30 p.m. the City Council will take up its regular agenda in Open Session in the Council Chambers, Monday, January 4, 2016. The meeting is open to the public, broadcast live and a copy of the meeting will be retained in the city’s archives.

Read the full agenda.

 

Available staff reports follow:

01/04/16 – Award of Contracts for Aquatics Center Maintenance as follows:

a. Replacement of Locker Room Floors to MC Construction Services

b. Replacement of the Main Pool Filter to Aquatic Commercial Industries

01/04/16 – Award of Contract to Cleary Brothers Landscape, Inc in the Amount of $12,250 for Blair Park Tree Removal

01/04/16 – Consideration of Acceptance of the 100% Complete Construction Documents and Specifications; Authorization to Solicit Bids for the Hampton Field Renovation Project; and the Phasing of the Project

01/04/16 – Consideration of Direction to Staff Regarding the Placement of a Municipal Services Special Tax Measure on the June 7, 2016 Presidential Primary Election Ballot

01/04/16 – Consideration of Ord. 720 N.S. Amending Chapter 17 of the City Code to Preserve Local Control by Prohibiting the Cultivation, Delivery and Dispensing of Marijuana

01/04/16 – Consideration of Authorization for the City to Join the ICLEI Compact of Mayors

01/04/16 – Introduction of the Concept of Building Energy Savings Regulations and Direction to Staff on Further Steps

Read previous article on marijuana issue in Piedmont.

Read previous articles on Piedmont Municipal Services Special Tax.

Read previous articles on Hampton Field.