Oct 14 2017

Which Towers Will Council Approve?  Which Towers Will Council Deny?

The Wireless tower installations applications will be approved or denied on Monday, October 16 at the regular City Council meeting at 7:30 p.m. in the City Council Chamber.  Perhaps one can guess the outcome by the following action previously taken by the Council:

The City Council continued the Public Hearing to its regular meeting of October 16, 2017 and directed staff to prepare draft resolutions approving, with conditions, the proposed sites at or near 340-370 Highland Avenue, 740 Magnolia Avenue, and 799 Magnolia Avenue.

The Council directed staff to prepare draft resolutions denying the applications at or near 150 Highland Avenue, 303 Hillside Avenue, 428 El Cerrito Avenue, 352 Jerome Avenue, and 1159 Winsor Avenue.

Read the staff report HERE.

Oct 14 2017

At the beginning of the Monday, October 16 Council meeting, the City Clerk will swear in Elizabeth Smegal Andersen to fill the vacant seat on the Council. Andersen will serve during the unexpired term ending in December 2018 of former Councilmember Jeff Wieler.

The Council meeting, open to the public, will be at 7:30 p.m. in the City Council Chamber and broadcast live on Channel 27 and the City’s website under videos. 

Oct 14 2017

At the October 16 Council meeting, the City Council is expected to appoint Lynne Wright Chair of Piedmont’s Public Safety Committee (PSC) on the recommendation of the committee following the September 15 resignation of Chair Lori Elefant, effective September 28, 2017. Elefant will remain a member of the PSC.

Oct 11 2017

Piedmonters are alerted to be watchful if their power is unexpectedly turned off.

On October 10, 2017, at 10:30 p.m., a home invasion robbery occurred in the City of Piedmont. It is believed that the suspects shut off the power to the victim’s residence to lure them outside. While inspecting the cause of the power outage outside of the home, one of the residents was confronted by one of the suspects who was armed with a firearm. Two additional suspects simultaneously confronted another resident inside the home.

The initial victim confronted outside was forced back into the residence at which point the three suspects demanded valuables from the victims and searched the house for items of value to take. One of the suspects struck one of the victims in the head with his firearm during the incident.

The three suspects took cash, electronics and other items of value from the home and victims before fleeing the scene in an unknown direction.

The suspects were described as follows: Suspect #1 was described as a black male adult in his 20’s, 5′ 8″, last seen wearing all black possibly wearing a mask or beanie, and armed with a black semi-automatic handgun. Suspect #2 is described as a black male adult in his 20’s, 6′ 0″, last seen wearing all black possibly wearing a mask or beanie, and possibly armed with a black semi-automatic handgun. Suspect #3 is described as a black male adult in his 20’s, shorter, last seen wearing all black clothing. It is unknown whether this suspect was armed.

The robbery took place in the 1300 block of Oakland Avenue.  

For future reference, readers may locate crimes on the following website of the Piedmont Police Department:

http://www.ci.piedmont.ca.us/police/crime.shtml

Anyone with information related to the robbery case is asked to contact Piedmont Detective Willie Wright at (510) 420-3013.

2 Comments »
Oct 11 2017

Soot and smoke blowing into the city –  

Piedmont residents have been directly impacted by the numerous fires north of Piedmont.  Elderly residents, those with compromised health, and young children have been advised to not linger or exercise outdoors when smoke is evident in the air.  Windows should be closed. 

The fires remind Piedmonters to prepare for an emergency such as a wildfire.

To learn how Piedmonters can prepare for emergencies go to the following links:

Click for Preparation Checklist > HERE.

The booklet, GET READY, PIEDMONT! was prepared for all Piedmonters.  The booklet is online > HERE.

Oct 11 2017

Is your neighborhood prepared for a major earthquake, wildfire, or other emergency?

Piedmont has a program to help neighborhoods come together to help each other. Would you like to help organize your block to join the other 30 Piedmont neighborhoods that have participated?

Communities across America have successfully implemented the “Map Your Neighborhood” (MYN) program to organize and prepare for public safety disasters in their communities. It is focused on neighborhoods with 15-25 adjacent residences (although there is flexibility on either end.)

The Piedmont Public Safety Committee and the Piedmont Fire Department will help facilitate MYN meetings which usually last 90 minutes. MYN provides a ready reference for actions to be taken before and after an earthquake, including mapping neighborhood utility shut-offs, preparing a neighborhood roster, and developing a process to check on the safety of all neighbors, particularly persons who are alone, disabled, or otherwise requiring assistance.

The program also provides a process to identify vital skills and resources that may exist in a neighborhood.

If you would be willing to organize your block or find out more about the program, please contact Sheila March at smarch@piedmont.ca.gov or (510) 420-3010.

Oct 10 2017

   On Wednesday, September 27th, I attended the school board meeting. It is a five member board of education that oversees Piedmont Unified School District (PUSD). The members are elected and can serve a maximum of two four-year terms. The board meets every other week.

    Following the meeting, I interviewed Cory Smegal, one of the five board members. She goes to every meeting. The board members are not paid so it is obvious how much Smegal cares about the district. Smegal did not have a particular issue she wanted addressed at the September 27th meeting, but she was interested in all the work on the facilities program. I was only allowed to attend the meeting for the first two hours, so Smegal filled me in on what happened afterward. She said, “we talked about the delivery method for the facilities program and approved a lease – leaseback arrangement so a general contractor can be brought on in the next few months to help with the program.”

   Smegal explained the facilities program is making sure all the PUSD facilities are functioning well and accessible. She gave the example of how the board “approved engineering studies so we can have plans created which will fix the drainage at the field, plus fix accessibility issues.” Piedmont is so fortunate to have such nice facilities, but it is imperative that we maintain these well.

   The main topics at the September 27th meeting were fundraising updates from the Piedmont Educational Foundation (PEF), California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) scores, and designs for the new Alan Harvey Theater and STEAM building.

   The first presenter was Heather Frank, the executive director of the PEF. She came to present the annual big check. The big check is the total of all the fundraising that the PEF has done over an entire year. It is all of their fundraising combined. This includes the Giving Campaign, Spring Fling, March Mingle, and many more fundraisers. This year the big check was for $2.4 million. This is 8% of the school’s total budget.

    The next presenter was Stephanie Griffin, Piedmont’s technology coordinator. She came to present the results for the 2017 CAASPP testing. In 2016, PUSD was #3 in ELA and #1 in math of all K-12 school districts in the state. In 2017, Piedmont was #2 in ELA and #2 in math. Griffin also went over the new accountability system that ranks schools more holistically. For example in addition to CAASPP scores they also rate schools’ climates. Some of the measures that indicate this are dropout and suspension rates. It will be interesting to see how Piedmont will rank with these new measures.

    The main presenter of the evening was Jeff Evans, the head architect of the new theater and STEAM building. He presented the designs he and his team have made so far. One big discussion about the new buildings was the energy efficiency. There will be lots of the solar panels on the new buildings. The architects have thought of creative ways to incorporate these in the designs. For example, in addition to having solar panels on the roof, there will be some solar panels on the windows and sun shades. They plan to have these buildings be around for the next fifty years so it is important that they be “future proof.” There is expected to have a rise in temperatures over the next fifty years so the architectures are working hard to have good cooling systems.

   The new buildings will include a more energy efficient alternative to air conditioning (metal pipes that carry liquid has air blow across them to cool the classrooms). They are also making sure there is room to add an AC unit if it is necessary later. Another way to keep the rooms cool is by opening them at night. They want to have at least one or two windows in each classroom that have motorized opening and closing so that cooling the rooms at night will be easy.

    I was really interested in the discussions about the new STEAM buildings. Everyone in the room seemed excited about this building. The engineering lab and art classrooms will open up to patios. Because of the new building, the school will be able to offer new classes such as engineering, digital art, digital media, and more computer classes.

   I think it is great that the school is changing the classes they offer to be more relevant with the 21st century. The new classes are going to let students be creative with medias that may apply to their future jobs. I wish I would be at Piedmont for the new STEAM building because it would give my fellow classmates and me a chance to explore subjects that could be our potential major in college.

    My other peers that came to the meeting and I all asked questions about the new building. My question was, “Has the cost of new teachers for the new classes to be offered been factored into the budget yet?” Mr. Booker answered my question. He explained that even though we are offering more classes, does not necessarily mean we need more teachers. Although my peers and I took a good amount of time asking our questions, I think the board was excited to see students curious about the new buildings.

    Not only did I go to the meeting because of Civics, but I was also there as the student representative. Because I am the ASB Vice President, I go to every other school board meeting and sit with the school board with a fancy plaque placed in front of me on the diaz and everything. In addition to asking questions about the new buildings at meeting, I also gave an update on what is happening at PHS and MHS.

Here are the updates I shared about PHS:

  • The quarter is going to be over soon (10/13), some midterms are coming up.

  • We started having birthdays and home games on the school announcements to encourage school spirit.

  • We had home football games the past three Fridays and this upcoming Friday (9/29) is the team’s bye week.

  • Clubs are starting to hold their first events (Voco had their first speaker today, Stay Woke met last week and the first Caring for Cambodia is meeting next week.)

  • Last Tuesday (9/19), the Giving Campaign tried to have the school have a purple spirit day for the launch, but no one really dressed up except ASB.

  • ASB is very busy planning Homecoming.

  • TPH (The Piedmont Highlander) handed out their first newspapers of the year last tuesday (9/19).

Here are the updates I shared about MHS:

  • Had there second advisory

  • Started a fundraiser for Kaiser

    Although the school board meetings are often long, it is always interesting to see what the parents in Piedmont are working on. I think all the adults at the meetings love having students at the meeting as a reminder of why they do all the work they do for the schools. As a student, it is great to go because we can never get enough reminders of how much effort the adults in our community put into giving us the best education possible.

By Anna Goldberg, Piedmont High School Senior

~~~~~~~~~~~

    On September 27th, I attended the Piedmont School Board meeting at the City Council Chambers.  This board typically meets on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month.  In the meeting that I attended, there were announcements and then reports concerning CAASPP results and developments in the new Alan Harvey Theater and STEAM building.  Starting a few minutes after 7 PM, PEF [Piedmont Education Foundation] presented the board with a big check from fundraisers throughout the year.  Following that announcement, the board went around sharing what they had done and events they had attended in the time since their last meeting.  Then the first topic was brought up.

    Ms. Stephanie Griffin was introduced to present the CAASPP testing results.  She mentioned that while our scores have decreased a bit, so did the best district’s.  Piedmont Unified School District is the best K-12 district in Northern California.

  Ms. Griffin continued to explain the shift from using the academic performance index, a single number, to using a new system that judges schools on multiple performance indicators.  In her presentation, she had many comparisons and charts about where our school district lies relative to other districts as well as how sub-groups in Piedmont High School perform differently.  At the end of Ms. Griffin’s presentation, the board had some clarification questions, such as whether everyone is being held to the same standards no matter what sub-group it is, which Ms. Griffin responded yes to.  Ms. Griffin stated that the overall take-away is that even top-ranked schools can continue to improve.

    The next topic had to do with a long term project – the new Alan Harvey Theater and STEAM building.  The architect that the district has hired presented to the board the current plan for the new buildings.  His presentation included multiple angles of the buildings, which he talked about in more detail.  Most of what he discussed concerned how he plans on achieving zero net energy buildings, since it was a guiding principle.  As a current high school student, it was amazing to see these models of what my current school may look like in a few years.  It will be completely foreign to me, yet I wish we had some of those new spaces now.  I look forward to seeing the new buildings but am also curious as to how they will look with the older buildings remaining relatively the same.  I had a lot of questions concerning the whole plan in general as well as details in the designs, and my two friends did too.  So when the board asked for comments and questions from the audience, my two fellow classmates and I asked both the board and the architect some questions, which mostly concerned how would the construction of the buildings and having the new buildings affect the school system and classes.  The project seems to be progressing very well.

    After the meeting, I got to ask Heather, the Executive Director of PEF, about her thoughts.  She was primarily there to present the check from PEF, but was also concerned about the district’s budget, because she wants to “make sure to learn all [she] can about the district’s budget and spending so [she] can help raise the money the schools need to continue providing excellent education.”

    In addition to her work there as part of PEF, she found that the CAASPP results showed that Piedmont students are doing well and are motivated.  She also said that she learned more about the plans for the new buildings.  Overall, Heather said that “This meeting was very positive. [She is] delighted that PEF was able to help fund some of the great work being done by the School Board, Superintendent Booker, the administration and the teachers.”

    The general meeting was more informative rather than a discussion, since it was filled with presentations and clarifications.  Both topics brought up in the meeting showed the growth in Piedmont schools, especially the high school.  Testing results reflected well on the district, and the new buildings are coming together.  The future for Piedmont schools is looking positive with the constant growth and the help of the School Board.

by Meryl Shi, Piedmont High School Senior

Editors’ Note:  Opinions expressed are those of the authors.
Oct 10 2017

Readers will find the reports prepared by Piedmont High School seniors offer diverse observations and opinions in students’ reporting. The following reports are on the  September 26, 2017 meeting.

Climate Action Plan Task Force Meeting

The Climate Action Plan Task Force is a committee appointed by the City Council of Piedmont in March 2017 that will end February of next year. This committee aims to transition Piedmont to become more ecologically conscious through legislative action. This task force meets every month to work on creating, revising, and drafting a climate change plan, which outlines the measures that must be taken in order to lower Piedmont’s ecological footprint. The task force met on the 26th of September to address the idea of making all of the city’s energy 100% renewable and to schedule future meetings and a workshop educating Piedmont’s citizens about the plan.

During the Climate Action Plan Task Force meeting, guest speaker Tom Kelly presented a project that would transition all of the PG&E energy used by Piedmont to 100% renewable sources by default with opt down and opt out options. By converting the entire city to renewable energy, citizens would have to pay an additional price. However, citizens have the ability to opt down, which means using a lower percentage of renewable energy due to the lower price, or to opt out, which means using the standard PG&E energy plan for the lowest cost.

This ambitious project raises concerns because Piedmont residents may not want to pay the additional cost, which would lead to a higher percent of opt-outs and opt-downs and eventually render the plan useless.

Kelly pointed out that, if Piedmont were to adopt this default 100% renewable energy plan, the city would become a leader among the other cities in Alameda County.

After Kelly’s presentation, Emily Alvarez, the project manager on the task force, as well as Tracey Woodruff, another member of the task force, discussed Piedmont Unified School District’s plans with the design of new high school buildings and the overall goal of having 0 net energy.

PUSD’s plan is to know the use of water and energy of each building and classroom, to get rid of extra boilers and possibly some showers, add solar panels to the roofs of the future classrooms, and switching lights at Witter Field and at the school to LED.

The last part of the meeting was dedicated to scheduling a future workshop meant to educate citizens of Piedmont about the climate action plan, especially the possibility of switching to 100% renewable energy.

I personally believe that Piedmont should adopt this 100% renewable energy plan because, first of all, Piedmont is an affluent city and thus has the financial capability and resources to make this transition, second of all, the adoption of this plan could lead to other cities adopting similar plans to address climate change, and lastly, the energy contract gives anyone in Piedmont who doesn’t want to pay as much money the ability to opt down or out. The plan doesn’t oblige anyone to follow through with having 100% renewable energy, but those who do follow through would be offsetting the damage of climate change by paying a few extra cents per kilowatt hour of energy.

No member of the committee spoke out against the plan because they agreed that such a measure should be considered as a part of their climate action plan. This meeting was less opinion-based and more about informing the committee members about the background behind this possible measure.

Students proposed measures like adding compost and recycling bins in Piedmont Park, making public-use vehicles use electric energy, planting trees where ivy once was around the high school campus, and increasing resident-only parking so as to motivate students to walk to school instead of drive.

Tracey Woodruff is one of the members of the Climate Action Plan Task Force who attended today’s meeting. She decided to participate in the task force because she finds participation in local politics important, she cares about climate change, and she does a lot of work in the environmental field. The challenge of creating a plan that takes action against climate change brought her here, and she explained that there is a lot of tension in regards to to the purpose of the plan itself. Some think that it should educate the public whereas others think that it should focus on merely changing city policies. Woodruff believes that the best option would be to adopt the default 100% renewable energy plan, especially since the only other cities adopting a similar plan in Alameda County are Newark and a couple others.

Woodruff’s next step as well as the task force’s next step as a whole is to have the community workshop in order to educate the citizens of Piedmont about the possible plan, engage them in the political process, and eventually gain the support to push this measure forward. She mentioned that the city of Piedmont voted to adopt the Paris Accords, which is another recent step that Piedmont has taken to address climate change. She also remarked that not everyone in Piedmont or on the City Council agrees on what the role of a city is in regards to climate change, which illustrates that it is harder than it seems to pass legislation and policies related to climate change because of the division of opinion. Overall, Woodruff learned that public process is time consuming and requires getting people engaged.

I asked whether or not Piedmont High School was currently using a certain percentage of renewable energy as well as whether or not the school would be included in the 100% renewable energy plan. I asked this while PUSD’s climate change plans were being discussed because I was thinking that, if the school doesn’t want to pay the additional cost of going 100% renewable, then it could at least switch to a PG&E plan with a certain percentage of renewable energy that is higher than the standard plan put in place today. It turns out that the current energy plan is the standard 30 to 40% renewable energy plan, and that the school would be included in the 100% renewable energy plan. However, the school would also have the ability to opt-down or opt-out, but I don’t think that the school would do so considering it plans to produce its own solar energy and thus has the desire to transition to renewable energy anyways.

This experience was enlightening for me because, as a person who doesn’t usually voice an opinion or ask questions about things, I felt like my question added to the discussion by clarifying the role of the school in the renewable energy plan. Also, I now realize that it is important to speak up because almost all of the proposed legislation and measures require public support, which means that my opinion matters and should be expressed. The Climate Action Plan Task Force is a committee that respects the environment as well as the opinions of the citizens of Piedmont. I am glad I was able to attend this meeting to witness how our city functions behind closed doors and participate in my local government as a citizen of Piedmont.

by Sophia Barker, Piedmont High School Senior

~~~~~~~~~~~~

On September 26, 2017 Piedmont’s Climate Action Plan Task Force met at City Hall.  The CAPTF meets once a month to discuss their plan to improve Piedmont’s environmental policies and regulations.

The meeting began with a presentation from Tom Kelly on how East Bay Community Energy could increase the percentage of renewable energy used in Piedmont homes, schools, and facilities.  The task force debated the costs and benefits of different energy plans, including one that would supply 100% renewable energy to all Piedmont homes while providing the opportunity to opt down to a lower level of renewables or opt out of the plan completely.

The following topic was a briefing of a meeting that had gone on between the CAPTF and the Piedmont School Board; in which the two groups shared new ideas, and discussed how they might be able to work together on certain overlapping plans.

One idea that Tracey Woodruff, the chair of the task force, mentioned, was to make city and school district vehicles electric and install charging stations.  Personally I thought this was a good idea because it would be a very recognizable change that the public could acknowledge as part of the city’s environmental policy.

Students from Piedmont High School spoke out at this time, proposing plans that could reduce waste in the parks at lunch and the number of students who drive to school.

To inform the public of the task force’s plans, a subcommittee was set up to organize an upcoming community workshop.  There was lots of debate between task force members over how the workshop should be organized, and what the goal of it should be.  Some task force members felt that the best way to inform the public would be a speaker series, whereas others felt that a station-based event would be better.  Many members felt that the purpose of the meeting should be to inform the public about the task force’s plans, but there was a group advocating a more generalized approach to educate the public about climate change.

After the meeting Tracey Woodruff spoke to a group of high school students in more detail about her goals.  Mrs. Woodruff joined the committee because she thinks that it’s important “to have civic engagement,” and because she “care[s] about climate change.”  Her next step in bolstering task force is the upcoming public workshop, which is planned to be an informative meeting to get the public on board with the task force’s plans.

by Will Dalton, Piedmont High School Senior

~~~~~~~~~~

    On the evening of September 26th, 2017, I had the privilege of attending a planning meeting for Piedmont’s Climate Action Task Force. The meeting began with a public forum, which gave community members in attendance the opportunity to speak to items that weren’t on the agenda. It was at this time that a few members of the community gave their own ideas for what might be useful for the plan. Included in these ideas were the possibility of a community light bulb recycling program, and more “resident only” parking spots near the school to disincentivize driving to school for students who might be able to walk.

    The next item on the meeting’s agenda was a presentation from Tom Kelly from East Bay Community Energy (EBCE). He spoke about what it might look like if the city of Piedmont, or the entirety of Alameda county opts into a community energy (CE) program. He discussed other cities that have made the program successful, and how the success stems from making the basic option for energy provided 100% renewable, as opposed to the lower percentage offered currently by PG&E. At this point, I asked what PG&E was doing to improve their percentage of renewable energy provided, to which he responded that they have options for this, but their baseline option only provides around 35% renewable energy. He went on to give data on what percentage of residents would need to opt out in order for the program to not be worth the city’s money, and all-in-all it seemed like it would be incredibly beneficial for the city of Piedmont to opt into the program.

    The task force went on to discuss a meeting that the city had with PUSD, and described the steps that the district reported to be taking to improve their energy usage, beginning with providing less hot water for PE showers given that a large percentage of water that is heated up each day goes unused. They discussed the possibility of applying for grants to implement charging stations near the school for electric cars, as well as a green infrastructure plan to deal with stormwater and help solve the issue of Witter Field being flooded and misshapen during times of rain. They also talked about the environmental club at PHS, and the steps they’re taking to push the campus’ agriculture and plants to be more sustainable, including replacing the ivy.

    The task force then voted to establish an outreach sub-committee, followed by their planning of a “public workshop and education day” for environmental issues. As the meeting went on, it became clear that the work they are doing is important for the community’s benefit, and that their main goal moving forward is to involve and engage the community in the process of improving our city’s environmental impact. “I hope that we will be able to spark more action in the community” said Margaret Ovenden, a member of the task force who described having gotten involved for the purpose of creating a plan of further action than previous, similar climate plans.

by Micah Bloom, Piedmont High School Senior

Oct 3 2017

“Betsy” Smegal Andersen grew up in Piedmont and attended Piedmont schools.   Betsy followed her mother, Sue Smegal,  in becoming active in Piedmont community issues. Her mother, served on the Piedmont School Board and is well known for civic participation.  Sister-in-law, Cory Smegal is the newest member of the Piedmont School Board.

Image result for Elizabeth Smegal Andersen

After graduating from Piedmont High School, Betsy attended Duke University and went on to UCLA School of Law.  She practices law in San Francisco.  Read about her law practice HERE.

Betsy and her husband, Robert, have two children in the Piedmont schools.

With Betsy’s appointment to the unexpired term of former councilmember Jeff Wieler, the Council will add a third woman to the five member Council.  Betsy’s long time involvement in Piedmont governmental processes and public policy decision-making will add another experienced member to the Piedmont City Council.

_____________________

City Press Release: At a special meeting held on October 2, 2017, Elizabeth Smegal Andersen was unanimously appointed to fill a vacancy on the Piedmont City Council.

After conducting interviews with twelve candidates, the Council chose Ms. Andersen to fill a term that will end when the results of the General Municipal Election of November 6, 2018 are certified, which likely will take place at the first Council meeting in December, 2018.

Prior to her appointment, Councilmember Andersen served on the Recreation Commission, beginning in 2014 and was the body’s Chair from 2016 until she was appointed to the Council. She has been an active volunteer for many years, also having served on the Aquatics Steering Committee and Public Safety Committee as well as several other community organizations, including the League of Women Voters and Piedmont Recreational Facilities Organization, among others.

The vacancy on the Council was created by the resignation of Councilmember Jeffrey Wieler on September 5, 2017.

Oct 3 2017

On September 26, 2017,  I went to the Climate Action Plan Task Force meeting. The Task Force meets about once a month. This meeting was to fine tune the Climate Action Plan for Piedmont, California. In addition to going over the Climate Action Plan, the partnership between the city of Piedmont and Piedmont High School was discussed and a presentation from Tom Kelly and Ben Foster about East Bay Community Energy took place.

 At the beginning of the meeting there was a Public Forum in which the public was able to bring up topics they wanted to talk about. At this time, two students spoke: Alex Lopez and Dylan Scov. Alex Lopez brought up the idea that the city should do a bulb drive in which people would trade in their old light bulbs for new ones and PG&E would subsidize the cost. Dylan Scov brought up student parking and suggested that the city should make a lot of streets resident-only parking as an incentive for students who live in walking distance of school to walk to school.

 The first topic discussed at the meeting was renewable energy. Tom Kelly and Ben Foster gave a presentation about East Bay Community Energy, an energy provider for the bay area. EBCE wants to create an energy plan that sets people up with 100% renewable energy as a default. The default would be 100% renewable, but there would also be opt-down and opt-out options. The 100% renewable default would be the most expensive, while the opt-out option would be the cheapest. To have this energy plan, the city needs to sign on as a whole, but if people are unable to pay for the default option, they can choose to opt-down or opt-out. Only a couple of cities have signed on to this plan, while others use PG&E which has an opt-up option that allows people to have 100% renewable energy. In addition to providing cities with renewable energy, EBCE is conducting research on greenhouse gases in the cities that have shown interest in the 100% renewable energy default program.

 Another topic that was discussed was the meeting the Task Force had with the City and the Piedmont Unified School District. The focus of this meeting was to discuss the plan for the new high school. The plan for the new schools aims to have zero net energy in all buildings. They did not discuss how this would be achieved. Another idea that was discussed was whether the schools would get rid of the boiler for showers or not. A lot of students spoke out about this saying that they did not know there were showers at the school or that no one uses the showers. In my opinion, the school should get rid of the boiler because it uses an immense amount of energy and I have not met anyone who uses the showers.

 Another issue that was briefly discussed was the poor drainage of Witter Field. After a heavy rainfall, Witter Field floods and it is damaging to the field and makes it so that sports teams cannot have practice or games until the flooding has cleared. Although they talked about creating a drainage system under the field to fix this problem, the date that this would happen was not confirmed.

At the end of the meeting, I interviewed Tracey Woodruff, a member of the Task Force. She decided to participate in the Task Force because she “[thinks] it’s important to… have civic engagement, to be involved in your city and local politics and this was a good fit for [her] because [she does] a lot of work in the environmental field”. She talked about a plan that was made previously, but it “sat on the shelf” so she wants this plan to actually take off and addresses climate change. To make sure the plan actually gets implemented, she and the Task Force are trying to figure out what their priority is.

 In my opinion, there should not be residential parking. Although a lot of people that drive to school live close enough to the school to walk, there a lot of people that do not live that close. I am someone who does not even live in Piedmont and I don’t have the option of walking to school.

As it is, there is not enough parking for students at Piedmont High School and making streets close to the school available for residents will only make the parking problem worse. If this were to happen then the people that do live close to school would likely get the available spots first and the people who need to drive to school would be stuck parking far away from school. If the city wants to stop people who can walk to school from driving to school there should be education about what driving to school does to the environment.

by Maggie Kossak, Piedmont High School Senior

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

On Tuesday, September 26, 2017, the Climate Action Plan Task Force met in the Emergency Operations Center in the City Hall of Piedmont, California. In the meeting, the Climate Action Plan Task Force covered several topics.

To open the meeting, two representatives from the city of Hayward, gave a presentation on Renewable Energy. They talked about how these new, 100% Renewable Energy programs should be offered to households across the Bay Area, and what sort of benefits they will have on society.

There was an open participation period in which people had the opportunity to share ideas they had for improving the environment. Following the open participation period, the Task Force discussed upcoming meetings, and went into great detail about what their plan was for these meetings. They illustrated how they were going to share their ideas, and what tactics they were going to use to persuade the officials that they would be talking to.

At the meeting on Tuesday, September 26, 2017, there were a number of issues that were brought up and discussed by several of the members of the Task Force, in addition to others who attended the meeting.

The most prominent was regarding Renewable Energy in the Bay Area. Tom Kelly, a representative of the city of Hayward, presented an idea to the Force. Kelly focused primarily on the goals he has for the entire Bay Area. He illustrated how PG&E’s current renewable percentage was below 30% on average. If the Bay Area, and eventually the entire state of California, wants to become 100% renewable energy, then this number is going to have to increase. However, PG&E will not make significant enough efforts to try and raise this number, so other measures must occur.

Kelly then proposed new programs, that start with about 50% renewable. These programs would be offered to all homeowners when they are first buying their houses. At first, the programs will cost more, but will save money over time. In addition to saving money, these programs will also gradually increase in terms of percent renewable over time, which is taking drastic steps towards 100% renewable energy. The absolute end goal, other than 100% renewable energy for all of California, is to have 100% renewable energy as a default option for residents and businesses in California.

Following the presentation, Kelly allowed for questions and concerns regarding his proposal. One man in the audience, who was not a member of the Climate Action Task Force, had a good amount of questions and concerns regarding Kelly’s proposed idea. The biggest of the concerns that the man addressed was this: these new programs are going to cost a lot more money to make, and install in everyone’s homes and businesses, so who is going to pay for all of this?

Although Kelly did not have a direct response to this concern, he came up with a few possible answers for the question asked. First, Kelly said that one resolution to the increase in price could be an increase in taxes. However, Kelly realized that this was probably not the best solution because of the financial negative effects it would have on all of the residents who would theoretically be buying the new programs.

Another proposed solution to the money issue would be government paying for it. This was the best solution because it was the most logical. Because going 100% Renewable Energy would save the government a very significant amount of money, the government would be more than willing to pay for the extra cost it would take to make and supply these new programs to all residents and businesses.

Personally, I think that these new 100% Renewable Energy programs are a huge step for not only the city of Piedmont and the Bay Area, but for all of California and the rest of the United States as well. As Global Warming continues, more and more ideas are coming up about how to reduce energy use, or develop clean energy that does not have a negative effect on the environment.

With these new programs, residents will be supporting the environment, without even knowing it. By switching to the programs, people will be using more and more clean, renewable energy all day, everyday, as opposed to dirty energy that we are using currently.

If everyone in Piedmont switches to these programs, then the Bay Area will see how much it is affecting the environment, and eventually the entire state of California, and the entire country will realize just how important clean, renewable energy is, and what positive effects it can have on society. That will influence them to switch to these new programs, and before we know it, the Country will be running on 100% renewable energy.

The Climate Action Plan Task Force meets twice a month, in the Piedmont City Hall to share ideas for how to improve the environment in both the city of Piedmont specifically, and the Bay Area as a whole.

by Dylan Skov, Piedmont High School Senior

~~~~~~~~~~

The government meeting I attended was the Climate Action Plan Task Force. This government task force meets once a month. In the beginning of the meeting I spoke during the public secession and suggested that we should have a bulb drive. I suggested that we team up with PG&E and have people come in and trade their incandescent bulbs for LED bulbs. Hopefully, if we teamed up with PG&E ,they would subsidize the cost. In doing a bulb drive we save people money and reduce emissions.

One purpose of the meeting was to review the 100% renewable default options proposed by East Bay Community Energy. Tom Kenny, from EBCE, presented a slideshow about how East Bay Community Energy (EBCE) will evaluate and provide 100% renewable energy for residents and businesses. Cities like Piedmont, Hayward, Albany and Berkeley want to take part in this study and work toward a 100% renewable energy options. At this point, over 153 cities have committed to a 100% clean energy plan. EBCE is teaming up with PG&E. Currently, PG&E has a plan to achieve 100% renewable energy by 2030.

Tracey Woodruff, a task force member, asked how the EBCE proposal would impact people’s utility bills.  Tom Kenny responded by saying the utility cost would remain about the same. EBCE representatives, Tom Kenny and Ben Foster left the meeting after their presentation.

Another topic that was addressed at the meeting was the partnership between the City and Piedmont High School to curb climate change. The City and PHS met to discuss goals for future action and this was reported on at the meeting.  Piedmont High School has set a list of goals that they hope to accomplish in the near future. Some goals were to invest in sub metering for each building, get rid of the boilers for the showers and have a solar plan. There is also a issue with Witter Field and its drainage system and if that could be fixed it would save money. Tracey Woodruff wanted to know what Piedmont schools needed to do to accomplish a zero net energy goal for all the buildings.

A plan that will benefit the school would be to switch all light bulbs to LED including the lights at Witter Field. That plan alone would save so much money. Likewise, the city hopes to invest in EV cars for the police department and that would require charging stations. There was also discussion on having a citywide shuttle like they have in Emeryville. A city shuttle can help reduce car use and decrease traffic. Not a lot more could be said about what Piedmont High School could do because there was not a representative present. After other administrative discussions on position changes and Public Workshops for climate change the meeting adjourned.

In my opinion, I think the school is the most important resource to help accomplish the city wide goal of curbing climate change. I believe that switching to LED lights in all the classrooms and on Witter Field will make a big difference. LED lights reduce electricity, reduce risk of combustion. They are also sturdier and save money. I believe installing solar panels at the high school will make a big difference. However, I am not sure that having a shuttle will change people’s behavior. People have cars and that’s how they get around Piedmont. We do not need to invest in another bus that will have few kids on it and just waste gas. Also, people need to get to placed outside Piedmont and it appeared that the shuttle would only transport people around Piedmont. There are better solutions than shuttles.

I interviewed a resident of Piedmont who showed up at the meeting. Her name was Janet Laurent and she lives on Highland Avenue. She came to the meeting because she is concerned about the sizes of the buses in Piedmont. In Mrs. Laurent’s opinion, “Transportation is the issue I’m interested in.” She noticed that a lot of Piedmont residents do not ride on the buses and they are always empty. Each day she notices this from her house on Highland at the start and end of the bus route. In her opinion, unnecessary buses are a major problem. When the option of having a Piedmont Shuttle was discussed at the meeting, Mrs. Laurent agreed that is was a good solution. With the buses coming up and down Highland, a shuttle would “free up parking and the residence.” Her reaction to the meeting was positive. She learned a lot and believed “good things will happen.” The next step Mrs. Laurent will take is to go to the workshops on transportation and help raise awareness among Piedmont residents.

by Alex Lopez, Piedmont High School Senior

 Editors’ Note: Opinions expressed are those of the authors.