Apr 19 2016

April 6th Park Commission Meeting

At 5:30 pm on April 6th, 2016, the City of Piedmont’s Park Commission began their monthly meeting. The Park Commission is tasked with evaluating and recommending improvements to the City’s public parks and street trees to the city council. They meet the first Wednesday of every month at 5:30 at Piedmont’s City Hall.

The meeting began with the presentation of a donation from the Piedmont Garden Club. The Garden Club works to beautify the natural environment of Piedmont and the surrounding area and their donation reflects the Park Commission’s commitment to promoting Piedmont’s outdoor spaces.

Two new members of the Park Commission, Jim Horner and Brian Mahany, were introduced. Both had backgrounds in construction and architecture, making them well suited to sit on the Park Commission. A new Park Commission Chair and Vice Chairpersons were elected in a quick and smooth example of democracy at work.  Jamie Totsubo, a longtime member of the Park Commission, became the new Park Commission Chair.

The new Chair was immediately tested in her first Public Hearing in the position. A resident who lived at 93 Sea View Avenue had submitted a request to remove four London Plane trees from the street in front of her house. The resident claimed that the tree roots caused displacement of the sidewalk, causing a public hazard to pedestrians. The tree roots had grown so far as to reach into her basement/foundation area and contribute to water seepage and flooding into these areas. This flooding, besides causing water damage, also caused ground soil to slide which undermined her foundations. The branches of the trees were depositing leaves and tree fruit onto her roof, clogging her gutters and causing roof damage when branches break and fall onto her roof.

The resident rose during the forum and spoke at length on the problem, showing photographs and documents to support her claims. Once she finished and sat back down the Park Commission revealed they had contracted a botanist to examine the four mentioned trees. The botanist’s report showed that the four trees are healthy and growing well.

The Park Commission presented letters from four neighbors of the resident who all wanted the trees to stay, saying that the ambiance of the neighborhood would be ruined with the removal of the four large trees. The Park Commission expressed similar sentiments, saying that although the trees could be problematic, they were worth it. They agreed that the roots were an issue and that the sidewalk displacement was a pedestrian hazard that had to be addressed. They agreed to look into repaving the sidewalk and installing a root block to prevent the roots from causing any more damage. They did not propose removing the four trees however.

The resident disagreed with her neighbors and the Park Commission over the ambiance provided by the trees. She began speaking out against the trees again, sparking a heated confrontation where Chair Jamie Totsubo struggled to maintain order in the meeting room. Totsubo after the meeting stated, “It’s not usually like this, the Park Commission is normally a very reserved place. Sometimes it’s hard to please the community and individual residents at the same time.” Finally the Park Commission unanimously passed a motion to repave the sidewalk and install a root block. No member of the Commission proposed removing the trees entirely.

Jamie Totsubo was the Park Commissioner responsible for coordinating Arbor Day Festivities. Occurring on April 27th at 5 p.m., Arbor Day activities are to take place in the Piedmont Park Tea Garden. A large maple tree will be installed in a planter box already built for it. There will be refreshments and appetizers and attendees will listen to Bill McNamara, a scientist who specializes in endangered species, speak. The Piedmont Jazz Band will play during the event and the Piedmont High School AP Environmental Science class will give a presentation. The winners of the logo contest for Arbor Day were announced and two Piedmont High students were the first place and runner up.

Everett Ellis, Piedmont High School Senior

Editors’ Note: Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Apr 16 2016

The entire Hampton Field project will move forward, if the Council approves Hampton Park Improvements Budget of $1,978,760.

City Administrator Paul Benoit in his April 18, 2016 staff report asks the City Council to approve a budget of $1,978,760 for Hampton Park Improvements and authorize him to sign a construction contract in the amount $1,573,435.50 with low bidder Suarez and Munoz to complete the plan for the park. (See plan of park facilities here.)

The City Council approved the Hampton Park Improvements Master Plan on June 2, 2008. The project was then sidelined due to budgetary constraints. On March 3, 2014, the Council awarded a $134,238 contract to William Harris, Harris Design for plans for phasing the project or, alternatively, completing the entire project at one time. Read the City Administrator’s Report here.

The focus has been on refurbishment of the hardscape surfaces for tennis, basketball and handball as well as drainage improvements (Phase I).  Hazardous conditions on the tennis courts, significant maintenance of the play field during and following wet weather, soil wash out onto nearby roadways, and other issues have been a concern. Measure WW, East Bay Regional Park District (EBRPD) Local Grant Funds, in the amount $507,325 were previously approved for the project. To complete the entire project, Phase I and II, the estimated cost is $1,978,761. The City will add $1,471,435 using various pots of City money and donations.

Funding Sources for the $1,978,761 Hampton Park Project:

  • EBRPD Measure WW Funds: $ 507,325
  • Private Donations & Commitments $ 303,254
  • City Athletic Facility Preservation Fund: $ 200,000
  • Harris Engineers Settlement: $ 417,000 (undergrounding)
  • City Facilities Maintenance Fund: $ 275,591
  • City General Fund: $ 275,591

City Sources = $1,168,182

Private Donations & Commitments = $ 303,254

EBRPD Measure WW Funds = $ 507,325

Read the City Administrator’s April 18, 2016 Report here.

Read the City Administrator’s January 4, 2016 Report here.

Agreement with Harris Design [separate from Harris Associates] in the amount of $134,238 was previously approved and expended by the City.

Read about Piedmont’s Risk Management Policy & Procedures for Major Capital Improvement Projects

The Council meeting is open to the public and will be broadcast live via Cable Channel 27 and live streamed on the City website – “videos.”  The meeting starts at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers, City Hall, 120 Vista Avenue. 

Apr 2 2016

The Capital Improvement Project (CIP) Review Committee will meet in the City Hall Conference Room on Tuesday, April 5 at 6 p.m. The meeting will not be broadcast or recorded, but is open to the public.

The CIP Review Committee is composed of seven members, 4 appointed by the City Council, chairs of both the Recreation and Park Commission, plus the current President of the Piedmont Beautification Foundation, a private organization benefiting Piedmont.  The City Council recently appointed Michael Henn to the Committee.

The Committee  makes recommendations to the City Council on Piedmont’s major improvement projects. Citizens may propose projects on a Proposal Form, < available here or from City Hall. Project proposals for this cycle closed March 25.  Many past projects have originated from the City staff and the Piedmont Beautification Foundation.

April 5 CIP agenda:

  • Update on recreation projects
  • Review of Citizen Proposals for CIP
  • Review of preliminary CIP wish lists and project budgets

Supporting information and lists of proposals have not been publicly provided.  Information will be made available at the meeting along with staff presentations on the various proposals.  Final approval of projects is dependent on available funding and will be acted upon by the City Council by June with consideration of the annual City Budget.

Apr 2 2016

The Piedmont Park Commission will meet on Wednesday, April 6 at 5:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, located in City Hall, 120 Vista Avenue.  New Commissioners Jim Horner and Brian Mahany will be introduced and new Chair and Vice Chair will be elected.

Agenda:

  • Approval of March 2, 2016 minutes
  • Presentation of Piedmont Garden Club donation
  • New commissioners introduced
  • Public Hearing on the removal of 4 London Plane trees at 93 Sea View Ave
  • Update on completed planting design for Linda/Kingston Triangle
  • Update on Hampton Park Master Plan
  • Update on Arbor Day April 27
  • Update on Climate Action Plan
  • Update on Warfield Avenue Street Tree
  • Monthly Maintenance report

The meeting will be broadcast live on cable Channel 27 and on the City’s website.

Apr 2 2016

March 21st City Council Meeting

The primary issue that was debated at the City Council meeting on March 21st was a petition to expand the area where dogs can be off leash in Dracena Park. Currently, there is a popular loop taken by dog owners that goes around most of the upper part of the park, where dog walkers are able to have their dogs off-leash. However, once they reach the main upper field area they are required to put their dogs on their leashes for a short period of time until they reach the pathway on the other side; where dogs are once again allowed to be off leash.

If this petition were to be successful, dog owners would be able to walk the full loop without having to put their dog on their leash. There is also a lot of opposition to this petition, primarily from those who live around the park such as Mark Becker.  Also, Council member Robert McBain, the Council Liaison to the Park Commission was opposed.

Patty Siskind, Chair of the Park Commission, suggested a solution to the issue that she and her colleagues had come up with. It would be to build a dry stack wall that would separate the dog area from the rest of the lawn. This would leave roughly one-third of the area for dogs to play and the remainder would be an area where people could play openly without concern for dogs. This dry stack wall would also help to properly drain the lawn because there is frequently a large puddle in the center of it after it rains. Building the wall Piedmont would have the ability to level the lawn, making it an easier and better place to play.

I believe that this is a proper solution to the issue, and once Piedmont has the monetary means to build this dry stack wall it should be done. It is a good compromise for both dog owners and residents who live nearby.

For my interview, I had a conversation with Trevor, a student at Piedmont Middle School. He was at the meeting because he wanted to argue in favor of increasing the area where dogs can play off-leash. He believes that Piedmont does not have enough open space for dogs to properly enjoy themselves and thinks that the compromise suggested by Patty Siskind would be a good solution. Trevor’s plans his next step is to attend several City Council meetings and to see the progression of this issue.

William Bird, Piedmont High School Senior

Editors’ Note:  Opinions expressed are those the author.
Mar 24 2016

At a special meeting on March 22, 2016, the City Council interviewed applicants and made appointments to fill vacancies on commissions and committees. Drawing on the talents of twenty five applicants for seventeen vacancies, the Piedmont City Council made the following appointments:

Budget Advisory and Financial Planning Committee

Nick Levinson – August Moretti – John Chiang (Alternate)

CIP Review Committee

Michael Henn

Civil Service Commission

Carolyn Collins  &  Kathleen Winters

Park Commission

Betsy Goodman –  Jim Horner – Brian Mahany

Planning Commission

Eric Behrens & Tony Theophilos

 Aradhana Jajodia (Alternate)

Public Safety Committee

Lori Elefant & Lynne Wright

Recreation Commission

Glyn Burge – Jeffrey Dorman – Vincent Fisher

Each of these appointments is for a three year term. Commission and Committee members are eligible to serve no more than two consecutive terms in office.  All of the appointments are to volunteer positions.

 

Mar 17 2016

City Council to Discuss Dracena Park Off-Leash Issue

Monday, March 21st – 7:30 p.m.

 City Council Chamber, 120 Vista Avenue

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council will discuss the Park Commission’s February 3, 2016 recommendation regarding the Off-Leash Area at Dracena Park at its regular meeting on Monday, March 21, 2016 at 7:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, located in City Hall,120 Vista Avenue.

The Park Commission held several meetings on this issue in 2015 and heard public testimony and made a recommendation to the City Council at their meeting of February 3, 2016. The video of that meeting is available on the City’s web site at http://www.ci.piedmont.ca.us/video

The matter will be heard by the City Council at their regular meeting.   The meeting will be broadcast live on Cable Channel 27 and on the City website at http://www.ci.piedmont.ca.us/video.

Staff report on Dracena Park <

You are invited to attend the City Council meeting and express your opinion.  Alternatively, you may choose to write your opinion and address the response to the Piedmont City Council, c/o City Clerk, 120 Vista Avenue, Piedmont, CA  94611 or send an e-mail to cityclerk@ci.piedmont.ca.us.

Council Agenda for March 21  <

For further information, contact Parks and Project Manager Nancy Kent at (510) 420-3064 or nkent@ci.piedmont.ca.us.

Mar 17 2016

Do you have a project for Piedmont?

CIP Committee Seeks Resident Proposals and Participation

Deadline for proposals: March. 25th – 5:00 p.m. City Hall

The Capital Improvement Projects Review Committee (CIP) is soliciting proposals for new city projects which would enhance our community. Ideas submitted by individuals, community organizations and City Staff are all considered. If you have a great idea, the committee would like to hear from you. Projects can range from sidewalk improvements to plantings to facility renovations or additions to undergrounding of utilities to parks.  

Download the > Proposal Form. Proposals are due no later than March 25th at 5:00 p.m. City Hall, 120 Vista Avenue.

All applicants/residents that have submitted proposals will be personally invited to attend the CIP Meeting to be scheduled in April. The meeting is open to the public.  This meeting will not be broadcast nor recorded. At this meeting, applicants will be asked to briefly describe their projects to the CIP Committee. The CIP Committee will then determine which projects will require a site visit.

The CIP Site Visit Tour will be scheduled for a Saturday in April. The tour will commence at City Hall at 9:00 am and then will proceed to CIP tour stops located throughout the City. At each of the tour stops, the CIP Committee will see the locations for proposed projects first hand.

At the undetermined date, a noon working lunch will be provided at City Hall for Committee members, city staff, and interested citizens.

At this working lunch the CIP Review Committee will attempt to compose their list of 2016-2017 CIP projects that they recommend as a part of this year’s budget process. The CIP chair in conjunction with CIP Review Committee members will be asked to prepare a list of recommended projects and narrative that will be forwarded to the City Council for consideration in the budget process.

Completed forms should be returned to the Department of Public Works, 120 Vista Avenue. If you have questions regarding the CIP process, please contact Nancy Kent Parks & Project Manager, at (510) 420-3064.

Mar 10 2016
As this website is dedicated to civic affairs, readers may want to take notice of an interesting example of civic process playing out in City Hall right now.
At a public hearing of the Park Commission to address 10-grader Milo Gaillard’s petition to open the upper lawn in Dracena Park to off-leash dog use, a Dracena Avenue neighbor opposed to the petition introduced a map showing that the current off-leash areas of the park are in contradiction to the intent of the 1974 Council resolution establishing the dog run.  A subcommittee was established to evaluate the petition but also took up the question of the validity of the current off-leash areas.
The subcommittee returned a report with little analysis of the feasibility of the petition but rather with a detailed analysis of the “legislative history” of the Dracena off-leash rules concluding that the current off-leash use of the park is “not consistent” with City Code.  The subcommittee report offered the following history as justification for its conclusion (emphasis added):
·       In 1970, the Council added a requirement to the City Code that dogs in public areas be on leash. Previously dogs could be off-leash, but had to be “at heel.”
·       In 1974, the Council amended the Code provision that dogs be on leash and allowed the Council, by resolution, to set off-leash areas. At that time, the Council designated four off-leash areas: Blair Park, Piedmont Park creek area, Dracena Park Pathway, and Linda Park.
·       In 1993, the City Council, by resolution, adopted the recommendations of the Park Commission regarding off-leash dogs in Dracena Park for a one year trial period.
·       In 1997, Council by Ordinance 569 N.S., consolidated many different provisions in the City Code relating to parks into a single chapter. This included defining the off leash areas originally established by resolution in 1974 into the City Code.
·       In 2000, the Council refined the definition of the off-leash areas, added rules for dogs using these areas, and added the requirement that dogs using off leash areas have a special license.
The subcommittee history leaves out important facts about the adoption and implementation of the Dracena Park off-leash rules (emphasis added):
~~~~~~First, from Piedmont Municipal Code, Chapter 4, “Animals”, 1989:
“Sec. 4.13  Running at Large.
It shall be unlawful for any person owning or having in charge, care, control or custody any dog to suffer or permit any such dog to trespass on private property. As an exception to this section, the City Council shall by resolution designate specific areas within the City in which any dog under the control of a competent person may be permitted to run without being secured by a rope, chain or other leash; provided that at no time shall a dog in such specified areas be further than fifty yards distance from the competent person controlling such dog or be allowed to threaten, intimidate,  bite or endanger any person in such specified areas; provided further, that the City Council may by resolution from time to time set forth specific times or days in such designated areas during which no dog may be permitted to run without being secured by a rope, chain or other leash not over six feet in length. (Ord. No. 291 N.S., ‘1; Ord. No. 316 N.S.,’1)”
~~~~~~~ from Ordinance 569 N.S, 1997:
3.4.2 Dog Runs Established. The following areas, which are illustrated on maps incorporated into this chapter, are designated as “dog runs” and dogs under the control of a competent person shall be exempt from the provisions of Section 4.13 of the municipal code when in these areas.
a.     Blair Park in it entirety
b.     Piedmont Park creek area from the rear of the Community Hall to the Wildwood playground
c.     Dracena Park pathway from Dracena Avenue to ArtunaAvenue
d.    Linda Park loop and upper path
3.4.3 Dog Run Signs Required. The Department of Public  Works shall be responsible for installation and maintenance of signs in all dog runs which clearly designate the area to be used by dogs off leash.
 ~~~~~~From the minutes of City Council, November 6, 2000:
City Council Action
After a large amount of public testimony on the ordinance, the Council approves the first reading of Ord. 619 N.S. making changes Sec. 3.4 of the City Code (Dogs in Parks) (Resolution 73-00) as follows: (New text is underlined and text to be removed is in strikeout)
Section 3.4.2 is amended to read:
“The following areas, which are illustrated in maps incorporated is this chapter are designated as “dog runs” and dogs under the control of a competent person shall be exempt of the provisions of Section 4.13 of the municipal code when in these areas.
1.     Blair Park in its entirety
2.     Piedmont Park creek area (designated by signs)from in the rear of the Community Hall to the Wildwood playground Piedmont Unified School District Property Line
3.     Dracena Park pathway (designated by signs) from Dracena Avenue to Artuna Avenue
4.     Linda Park loop and upper path (within fenced off-leash area).
Section 3.4.3 is amended to read:
“The Department of Public Works shall be responsible for installation and maintenance of signs in all off leash areas which clearly designate the area to be used by dogs off leash and the rules for off leash areas as established in Section 3.4.4 of this Code.”
With this additional history, especially the definition of off leash dogs in Chapter 4 that allows dogs to be within 50 yards of their owner, the current off leash use of Dracena Park is completely consistent with City Code.
 Under the definition of off-leash in Chapter 4, all of upper Dracena Park is off-leash dog run, being within 50 yards of the Dracena-Artuna pathway.
In this context, the 1993 trial period allowing dogs on the upper pathway was a reduction of the off-leash area of the park and Milo’s petition, rather than a request for a new use, seeks restoration of what was once allowed.
Even without Chapter 4, the history supports the intent of City Council to expand the off-leash use of the park from the 1974 resolution to what it is today. In Ordinance 569, City Council established the authority of the Public Works Department to designate with signs the area to be used by dogs off-leash and current signage in place for over 20 years supports that.
In 2000, Council explicitly removed references to a trails map and again reiterates the role of Public Works to designate the areas and rules for off leash dog use.  In Dracena Park, staff implementation is clearly evident by signage which designates upper and lower pathways as off -leash and the lawn as on-leash.
So here’s the civics question: does a single word from the 1974 resolution, “pathway”, trump 30 years of Council action and city administration to the contrary?  Are off-leash dogs that wander off the pathway “inconsistent” with City Code or do the signs throughout the park define the off leash area?
 It’s the classic example of the “original vs. living” document debate of Justices Scalia and Breyer at the U.S. Supreme Court!  OK, that may be a stretch as we are talking about a 10th-grader’s “simple” petition to let dogs on the lawn. But the consequences to dog owners are serious.
The Park Commission is recommending a 50% reduction in the use of the upper half of the dog run, the section most used by dog owners, especially seniors.
Now, Council will take up this “great debate” at its March 21 meeting. Will it continue with this can of worms and reopen this contentious issue or will it honor past Council direction and maintain staff’s discretion to manage the off leash areas?  In that regard, the Council might want to consider some advice Milo has been hearing from City Hall – be careful what you ask for.
With a pending ballot initiative to increase the parcel tax, will it reduce off-leash use of Dracena Park, one of the most popular municipal services provided for by the tax?
Garrett Keating, Former Piedmont Councilmember
Editors’ Note: Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Mar 4 2016

On rainy Friday, March 4th, the City Council, participating City staff and contractors gathered for the ribbon-cutting to re-open the Community Hall after two months of renovations.

City Administrator supplied the scissors

City Administrator Paul Benoit supplied the ribbon cutting     scissors.

Mayor cuts the ribbon

Mayor Margaret Fujioka cutting the ribbon.

Council member McBain

Council member Bob McBain looking at the new flooring.

IMG_6920

Festive celebratory buffet

new drinking fountain

New drinking fountain

new floor

New floor

new wall sconces

New wall sconces