Dear Members of the Piedmont City Council,,
Dear Members of the Piedmont City Council,,
The City of Piedmont is looking for a few talented volunteers for vacancies on commissions and committees. Interested residents may view [also linked below] the Commission Description of Duties, download the Application for Appointive Vacancy, and/or apply online on the City’s web site at https://www.ci.piedmont.ca.us/.
Applications are due to City Hall on or before the deadline of Wednesday, March 17th.
Interviews with the City Council for these positions will be scheduled for the evenings of Monday, March 22nd and Monday, March 29th. Applicants will be notified of their interview date after the application period closes. No appointments will be made without a Council interview. All interviews will be virtual.
Commission / Committee | No. of Vacancies |
No. of Incumbents Eligible for Reappointment |
Budget Advisory and Financial Planning Committee |
2 | 1 |
CIP Review Committee | 1 | 0 |
Civil Service Committee | 2 | 1 |
Housing Advisory Committee | 4 or 6 | 0 |
Park Commission | 2 | 2 |
Planning Commission | 2 | 2 |
Police & Fire Pension Board & City Investment Subcommittee |
1 | 1 |
Public Safety Committee | 2 | 1 |
Recreation Commission | 2 | 0 |
Residents with questions are invited to contact the City Clerk’s office at (510) 420-3040.
The response to the 2007 survey exceeded all expectations. Approximately 3,800 surveys were mailed out, and almost 1,300 surveys were completed and returned. That’s a 34% response rate, the highest ever response rate of any community survey of Piedmont residents. Question 7 in the survey asked “For which types of projects would you support increases in city taxes or fees?”. The range of responses to that question are in the table below.
Q7: FOR WHICH TYPES OF PROJECTS WOULD YOU SUPPORT INCREASES IN CITY TAXES OR FEES? | ||||||
Total with Opinion | Response Average | Strongly Oppose | Somewhat Oppose | Somewhat Support | Strongly Support | |
Additional recreational facilities | 1116 | 2.69 | 20.2% | 17.4% | 35.7% | 26.8% |
Landscaping and tree planting | 1155 | 2.87 | 13.3% | 15.2% | 42.9% | 28.6 |
City-owned competitive swimming pool | 1124 | 2.59 | 28.3% | 15.1% | 25.5% | 31.0% |
Undergrounding of overhead utility wires | 1159 | 2.96 | 18.5% | 11.8% | 25.0% | 44.7% |
A parking garage in the City Hall area | 1122 | 2.21 | 37.9% | 21.7% | 22.4% | 18.1% |
More child care centers | 932 | 2.25 | 29.4% | 27.8% | 30.9% | 11.9% |
A teen center | 1083 | 2.87 | 17.6% | 12.3% | 35.7% | 34.3% |
Bike paths and marked bike lanes | 1095 | 2.85 | 14.8% | 16.6% | 36.9% | 31.7% |
A community gathering place or plaza | 1080 | 2.78 | 17.9% | 16.8% | 35.1% | 30.3% |
City arts and cultural center | 1067 | 2.57 | 22.2% | 20.0% | 36.7% | 21.1% |
Wheeled mixed materials recycling carts | 1003 | 2.63 | 22.1% | 20.8% | 29.0% | 28.0% |
Backyard service for recycling/ green waste | 998 | 2.60 | 23.3% | 21.2% | 27.3% | 28.2% |
Free citywide wireless (WiFi) internet | 1030 | 2.80 | 22.5% | 13.5% | 25.7% | 38.3% |
Additional recreation facilities – check.
City-owned pool? – check.
Backyard service for recycling/green waste – check.
City arts and cultural center – half-check. The city has a classical arts and cultural center. Chamber music only.
A teen center – negative.
Creating a community gathering place or plaza – negative.
Why this lookback matters is because the city is on the verge of missing a golden opportunity to address the two negatives on the list. A teen/senior center and community drop-in space could easily be run out of the East Wing of the building with access to the restrooms in the West Wing and the placing of city staff in the West Wing office space. And no additional taxes required – seniors and the community don’t need to be supervised by staff. They do need a place to freely gather and schedule meetings and an accessible East Wing would facilitate that.
Instead, city staff has negotiated a lease for the 801 Magnolia Building with the Piedmont Center for the Arts that reduces both city use of and access to the 801 building for the next 7 years. There are significant flaws in the lease (https://www.piedmontcivic.org/2020/11/29/opinion-four-major-flaws-in-proposed-art-center-lease/) and better ideas for true community use of the space (https://www.piedmontcivic.org/2021/02/03/opinion-arts-center-founder-wants-usage-opened-up/ ; https://www.piedmontcivic.org/2021/01/10/opinion-a-false-choice-has-been-presented-for-arts-center-lease/).
So the City has two choices – hold a public hearing on the use of the 801 Magnolia building or a second reading of the flawed lease. By all indications, city staff is proceeding with a second reading of the lease with PCA. Unless Council steps up and calls for a public hearing, this opportunity for Piedmonters to achieve long-standing aspirations of a community space will be lost for another 7 years. To that end, newly elected Councilwoman Conna McCarthy could honor her campaign pledge and call for public meetings on the use of 801 before any lease is approved:
“I want to be part of the leadership that encourages large conversations where all stakeholders thoughtfully plan and manage limited resources for the benefit of Piedmont now and into the future.”
Elected Council Candidate Conna McCarthy
https://www.piedmontcivic.org/category/new-elections/page/8/
If you want the City Council to hold public hearings on the use of 801 Magnolia Avenue, you can reach all Council members at citycouncil@ci.piedmont.ca.us.
Garrett Keating, Former Member of the Piedmont City Council
|
|
|
|
Ideas have included increasing the number of Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs), converting large homes into multiple housing units, rezoning single-family residential zones, reducing lot size requirements, modifying requirements in the Estate Residential Zone, building multiple housing on Grand Avenue and in the Civic Center, rezoning Blair Park for multiple housing, increasing height limits, and development emphasizing low-income and affordable housing. Piedmont has indicated an interest in adding approximately 600 new housing units to the existing approximate 3,800 households.
To learn more about the February 1, 2021 meeting, please watch the video on the City webpage. For more information, sign up to receive housing updates in your email in-box or email from Senior Planner Pierce Macdonald-Powell.
– Piedmont REACH Code problems explained to the California Building Standards Commission –
To: cbsc@dgs.ca.govFebruary 12, 2021
Dear CA Building Standards Commission,
As a resident of Piedmont CA, I have some serious concerns regarding the passing of the “REACH” codes. Here is a copy of my letter to the council that states my concerns. They said there was a survey, but none of our friends were in the survey, so it seemed not to be representative of the residents.
First, Piedmonter’s were not all included in the survey – many friends are upset because they were not included. Many disagree with the Reach concept and do not feel represented thus my suggestion of A ballot vote for all..Second is the impact of cost to the residential home owner. In Piedmont, a normal bathroom remodel will cost say $40,000. If one adds the Reach upgrades, it could add another $10,000. or more. Or consider the cost of a new roof…then add the insulation etc.. As a designer, I am familiar with those costs. Does this mean homeowners will not proceed with the work?
Third is our local enforcement of the use of less gas. This should be handled by an overall state building code to reduce off gassing. The changes are now being studied for action by the State. (Our use is small in the overall scheme. Consider the air pollution of autos and air travel.)
Fourth we also have our regional wildfire electric blackouts which could leave residents without ability to cook and heat our homes if we rely on electric power source.
Years ago, Title 24 was added to the California code requirements and we had a time limit to reduce electric usage by lowering the voltage of electric bulbs. This was handled by the state and the manufacturers were put into a position to create products for the market that fit the bill. We now have those products and enforcement in our building codes. This is a more reasonable course of action.
Sylvia Willard Fones, Piedmont Resident
Editors Note: Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Nomination Forms are also available on the City’s website: https://piedmont.ca.gov/cms/one.aspx?portalId=13659823&pageId=17431167
For more information, please contact:
Nancy Kent at nkent@piedmont.ca.gov
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We will eventually display the “Things that Matter” quilt, with our interwoven and diverse narratives to capture this unique time, in the new theatre building.
Any funds raised will be used exclusively towards inclusive visual and performing arts programs at PUSD. We are launching our quilt project in February during Black History Month. As March is Art Month, we plan on weaving our creative community stories and unveiling the quilt in a public open space. Quilt Kits are available for a variable donation, and we also are offering free kits to community members who are not able to donate at this time. Our goal is to represent our entire community through this unique art project and we hope you will create this piece of history with us.
https://piedmontstore.org/prod